Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam R. Kosiorek
dblp:202/1842
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
3D vision · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat: Generative Modelling of Moving Objects · NeurIPS 2018 Hierarchical Attentive Recurrent Tracking · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
adversarial masking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Masking for Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked image modeling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Masking for Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation
3d scene generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NeRF-VAE: A Geometry Aware 3D Scene Generative Model · ICML 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NeRF-VAE: A Geometry Aware 3D Scene Generative Model · ICML 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
neural radiance field |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NeRF-VAE: A Geometry Aware 3D Scene Generative Model · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MetaFun: Meta-Learning with Iterative Functional Updates · ICML 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GENESIS: Generative Scene Inference and Sampling with Object-Centric Latent Representations · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Set Transformer: A Framework for Attention-based Permutation-Invariant Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
capsule network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stacked Capsule Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
permutation-invariant neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Set Transformer: A Framework for Attention-based Permutation-Invariant Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › variational objective
evidence lower bound |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Tighter Variational Bounds are Not Necessarily Better · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › deep latent variable model
object-centric generative model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat: Generative Modelling of Moving Objects · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Tighter Variational Bounds are Not Necessarily Better · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Tighter Variational Bounds are Not Necessarily Better · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
hierarchical attention |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hierarchical Attentive Recurrent Tracking · NIPS 2017 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
single object tracking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hierarchical Attentive Recurrent Tracking · NIPS 2017 |
Visual content generation and editing › scene authoring
scene generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | GENESIS: Generative Scene Inference and Sampling with Object-Centric Latent Representations · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
inducing point methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Set Transformer: A Framework for Attention-based Permutation-Invariant Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Set Transformer: A Framework for Attention-based Permutation-Invariant Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › label-efficient image classification
unsupervised image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Stacked Capsule Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object discovery
unsupervised object discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat: Generative Modelling of Moving Objects · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
amortized inference · 0.9latent representation · 0.9generative scene inference · 0.9recurrent neural network · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6adversarial training · 0.6variational autoencoder · 0.5differentiable volume rendering · 0.5functional gradient descent · 0.4conditional neural process · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Adversarial Masking for Self-Supervised LearningabstractWe propose ADIOS, a masked image model (MIM) framework for self-supervised learning, which simultaneously learns a masking function and an image encoder using an adversarial objective. The image encoder is trained to minimise the distance between representations of the original and that of a masked image. The masking function, conversely, aims at maximising this distance. ADIOS consistently improves on state-of-the-art self-supervised learning (SSL) methods on a variety of tasks and datasets—including classification on ImageNet100 and STL10, transfer learning on CIFAR10/100, Flowers102 and iNaturalist, as well as robustness evaluated on the backgrounds challenge (Xiao et al., 2021)—while generating semantically meaningful masks. Unlike modern MIM models such as MAE, BEiT and iBOT, ADIOS does not rely on the image-patch tokenisation construction of Vision Transformers, and can be implemented with convolutional backbones. We further demonstrate that the masks learned by ADIOS are more effective in improving representation learning of SSL methods than masking schemes used in popular MIM models. Yuge Shi, N. Siddharth 0001, Philip Torr 0001, Adam R. Kosiorek |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | NeRF-VAE: A Geometry Aware 3D Scene Generative ModelabstractWe propose NeRF-VAE, a 3D scene generative model that incorporates geometric structure via Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and differentiable volume rendering. In contrast to NeRF, our model takes into account shared structure across scenes, and is able to infer the structure of a novel scene—without the need to re-train—using amortized inference. NeRF-VAE’s explicit 3D rendering process further contrasts previous generative models with convolution-based rendering which lacks geometric structure. Our model is a VAE that learns a distribution over radiance fields by conditioning them on a latent scene representation. We show that, once trained, NeRF-VAE is able to infer and render geometrically-consistent scenes from previously unseen 3D environments of synthetic scenes using very few input images. We further demonstrate that NeRF-VAE generalizes well to out-of-distribution cameras, while convolutional models do not. Finally, we introduce and study an attention-based conditioning mechanism of NeRF-VAE’s decoder, which improves model performance. Adam R. Kosiorek, Heiko Strathmann, Daniel Zoran, Pol Moreno, Rosália G. Schneider, Sona Mokrá, Danilo Jimenez Rezende |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | GENESIS: Generative Scene Inference and Sampling with Object-Centric Latent Representations
Martin Engelcke, Adam R. Kosiorek, Oiwi Parker Jones, Ingmar Posner |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | MetaFun: Meta-Learning with Iterative Functional UpdatesabstractWe develop a functional encoder-decoder approach to supervised meta-learning, where labeled data is encoded into an infinite-dimensional functional representation rather than a finite-dimensional one. Furthermore, rather than directly producing the representation, we learn a neural update rule resembling functional gradient descent which iteratively improves the representation. The final representation is used to condition the decoder to make predictions on unlabeled data. Our approach is the first to demonstrates the success of encoder-decoder style meta-learning methods like conditional neural processes on large-scale few-shot classification benchmarks such as miniImageNet and tieredImageNet, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance. Jin Xu 0011, Jean-Francois Ton, Hyunjik Kim, Adam R. Kosiorek, Yee Whye Teh |
ICML | 4 |
| 2019 | Scrutinizing and De-Biasing Intuitive Physics with Neural Stethoscopes
Fabian Fuchs, Oliver Groth, Adam R. Kosiorek, Alex Bewley, Markus Wulfmeier, Andrea Vedaldi, Ingmar Posner |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2019 | Set Transformer: A Framework for Attention-based Permutation-Invariant Neural NetworksabstractMany machine learning tasks such as multiple instance learning, 3D shape recognition, and few-shot image classification are defined on sets of instances. Since solutions to such problems do not depend on the order of elements of the set, models used to address them should be permutation invariant. We present an attention-based neural network module, the Set Transformer, specifically designed to model interactions among elements in the input set. The model consists of an encoder and a decoder, both of which rely on attention mechanisms. In an effort to reduce computational complexity, we introduce an attention scheme inspired by inducing point methods from sparse Gaussian process literature. It reduces the computation time of self-attention from quadratic to linear in the number of elements in the set. We show that our model is theoretically attractive and we evaluate it on a range of tasks, demonstrating the state-of-the-art performance compared to recent methods for set-structured data. Juho Lee 0001, Yoonho Lee 0001, Jungtaek Kim 0001, Adam R. Kosiorek, Seungjin Choi 0001, Yee Whye Teh |
ICML | 4 |
| 2019 | Stacked Capsule AutoencodersabstractObjects are composed of a set of geometrically organized parts. We introduce an unsupervised capsule autoencoder (SCAE), which explicitly uses geometric relationships between parts to reason about objects. Since these relationships do not depend on the viewpoint, our model is robust to viewpoint changes. SCAE consists of two stages. In the first stage, the model predicts presences and poses of part templates directly from the image and tries to reconstruct the image by appropriately arranging the templates. In the second stage, the SCAE predicts parameters of a few object capsules, which are then used to reconstruct part poses. Inference in this model is amortized and performed by off-the-shelf neural encoders, unlike in previous capsule networks. We find that object capsule presences are highly informative of the object class, which leads to state-of-the-art results for unsupervised classification on SVHN (55%) and MNIST (98.7%). Adam R. Kosiorek, Sara Sabour, Yee Whye Teh, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Revisiting Reweighted Wake-Sleep for Models with Stochastic Control Flow
Tuan Anh Le 0001, Adam R. Kosiorek, N. Siddharth 0001, Yee Whye Teh, Frank D. Wood |
UAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Tighter Variational Bounds are Not Necessarily BetterabstractWe provide theoretical and empirical evidence that using tighter evidence lower bounds (ELBOs) can be detrimental to the process of learning an inference network by reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of the gradient estimator. Our results call into question common implicit assumptions that tighter ELBOs are better variational objectives for simultaneous model learning and inference amortization schemes. Based on our insights, we introduce three new algorithms: the partially importance weighted auto-encoder (PIWAE), the multiply importance weighted auto-encoder (MIWAE), and the combination importance weighted autoencoder (CIWAE), each of which includes the standard importance weighted auto-encoder (IWAE) as a special case. We show that each can deliver improvements over IWAE, even when performance is measured by the IWAE target itself. Furthermore, our results suggest that PIWAE may be able to deliver simultaneous improvements in the training of both the inference and generative networks. Tom Rainforth, Adam R. Kosiorek, Tuan Anh Le 0001, Chris J. Maddison, Maximilian Igl, Frank D. Wood, Yee Whye Teh |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat: Generative Modelling of Moving ObjectsabstractWe present Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat (SQAIR), an interpretable deep generative model for image sequences. It can reliably discover and track objects through the sequence; it can also conditionally generate future frames, thereby simulating expected motion of objects. This is achieved by explicitly encoding object numbers, locations and appearances in the latent variables of the model. SQAIR retains all strengths of its predecessor, Attend, Infer, Repeat (AIR, Eslami et. al. 2016), including unsupervised learning, made possible by inductive biases present in the model structure. We use a moving multi-\textsc{mnist} dataset to show limitations of AIR in detecting overlapping or partially occluded objects, and show how \textsc{sqair} overcomes them by leveraging temporal consistency of objects. Finally, we also apply SQAIR to real-world pedestrian CCTV data, where it learns to reliably detect, track and generate walking pedestrians with no supervision. Adam R. Kosiorek, Hyunjik Kim, Yee Whye Teh, Ingmar Posner |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Hierarchical Attentive Recurrent TrackingabstractClass-agnostic object tracking is particularly difficult in cluttered environments as target specific discriminative models cannot be learned a priori. Inspired by how the human visual cortex employs spatial attention and separate where'' andwhat'' processing pathways to actively suppress irrelevant visual features, this work develops a hierarchical attentive recurrent model for single object tracking in videos. The first layer of attention discards the majority of background by selecting a region containing the object of interest, while the subsequent layers tune in on visual features particular to the tracked object. This framework is fully differentiable and can be trained in a purely data driven fashion by gradient methods. To improve training convergence, we augment the loss function with terms for auxiliary tasks relevant for tracking. Evaluation of the proposed model is performed on two datasets: pedestrian tracking on the KTH activity recognition dataset and the more difficult KITTI object tracking dataset. Adam R. Kosiorek, Alex Bewley, Ingmar Posner |
NIPS | 1 |