Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanan Rosemarin

dblp:202/1885 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
online scheduling
0.822019
Emergency Department Online Patient-Caregiver Scheduling · AAAI 2019
Emergency Department Online Patient-Caregiver Scheduling · AAAI 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
secret-shared shuffle
0.512021
Secure Graph Analysis at Scale · CCS 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.512021
Secure Graph Analysis at Scale · CCS 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
verifiable shuffle
0.512021
Secure Graph Analysis at Scale · CCS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 1.5secure shuffle · 0.5secret sharing · 0.5honest-majority MPC · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Secure Graph Analysis at Scale
abstract
We present a highly-scalable secure computation of graph algorithms, which hides all information about the topology of the graph or other input values associated with nodes or edges. The setting is where all nodes and edges of the graph are secret-shared between multiple servers, and a secure computation protocol is run between these servers. While the method is general, we demonstrate it in a 3-server setting with an honest majority, with either semi-honest security or full security. A major technical contribution of our work is replacing the usage of secure sort protocols with secure shuffles, which are much more efficient. Full security against malicious behavior is achieved by adding an efficient verification for the shuffle operation, and computing circuits using fully secure protocols. We demonstrate the applicability of this technology by implementing two major algorithms: computing breadth-first search (BFS), which is also useful for contact tracing on private contact graphs, and computing maximal independent set (MIS). We implement both algorithms, with both semi-honest and full security, and run them within seconds on graphs of millions of elements.
Toshinori Araki, Jun Furukawa 0001, Kazuma Ohara, Benny Pinkas, Hanan Rosemarin, Hikaru Tsuchida 0001
CCS5
2019 Emergency Department Online Patient-Caregiver Scheduling
abstract
Emergency Departments (EDs) provide an imperative source of medical care. Central to the ED workflow is the patientcaregiver scheduling, directed at getting the right patient to the right caregiver at the right time. Unfortunately, common ED scheduling practices are based on ad-hoc heuristics which may not be aligned with the complex and partially conflicting ED's objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel online deep-learning scheduling approach for the automatic assignment and scheduling of medical personnel to arriving patients. Our approach allows for the optimization of explicit, hospital-specific multi-variate objectives and takes advantage of available data, without altering the existing workflow of the ED. In an extensive empirical evaluation, using real-world data, we show that our approach can significantly improve an ED's performance metrics.
Hanan Rosemarin, Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus
AAAI1
2019 Emergency Department Online Patient-Caregiver Scheduling
abstract
Emergency Departments (EDs) provide an imperative source of medical care. Central to the ED workflow is the patientcaregiver scheduling, directed at getting the right patient to the right caregiver at the right time. Unfortunately, common ED scheduling practices are based on ad-hoc heuristics which may not be aligned with the complex and partially conflicting ED’s objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel online deep-learning scheduling approach for the automatic assignment and scheduling of medical personnel to arriving patients. Our approach allows for the optimization of explicit, hospitalspecific multi-variate objectives and takes advantage of available data, without altering the existing workflow of the ED. In an extensive empirical evaluation, using real-world data, we show that our approach can significantly improve an ED’s performance metrics.
Hanan Rosemarin, Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus
AAAI1
2019 Playing Chess at a Human Desired Level and Style
abstract
Human chess players prefer training with human opponents over chess agents as the latter are distinctively different in level and style than humans. Chess agents designed for human-agent play are capable of adjusting their level, however their style is not aligned with that of human players. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for designing such agents by integrating the theory of chess players' decision-making with a state-of-the-art Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach using two sets of analyses. Quantitatively, we establish that the agents attain their desired Elo ratings. Qualitatively, through a Turing-inspired test with a human chess expert, we show that our agents are indistinguishable from human players.
Hanan Rosemarin, Ariel Rosenfeld
HAI1