Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan M. Köhler
dblp:202/2323
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 82% Trustworthy machine learning · 12% Image recognition and object detection · 6% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
ensemble-based active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Network Quantization · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Network Quantization · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
prediction calibration |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 0.3monte carlo dropout · 0.3ensemble · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image ClassificationabstractDeep learning methods have become the de-facto standard for challenging image processing tasks such as image classification. One major hurdle of deep learning approaches is that large sets of labeled data are necessary, which can be prohibitively costly to obtain, particularly in medical image diagnosis applications. Active learning techniques can alleviate this labeling effort. In this paper we investigate some recently proposed methods for active learning with high-dimensional data and convolutional neural network classifiers. We compare ensemble-based methods against Monte-Carlo Dropout and geometric approaches. We find that ensembles perform better and lead to more calibrated predictive uncertainties, which are the basis for many active learning algorithms. To investigate why Monte-Carlo Dropout uncertainties perform worse, we explore potential differences in isolation in a series of experiments. We show results for MNIST and CIFAR-10, on which we achieve a test set accuracy of 90% with roughly 12,200 labeled images, and initial results on ImageNet. Additionally, we show results on a large, highly class-imbalanced diabetic retinopathy dataset. We observe that the ensemble-based active learning effectively counteracts this imbalance during acquisition. William Beluch, Tim Genewein, Andreas Nürnberger, Jan M. Köhler |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2018 | Variational Network Quantization
Jan Achterhold, Jan M. Köhler, Anke Schmeink, Tim Genewein |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2017 | Weakly-supervised localization of diabetic retinopathy lesions in retinal fundus imagesabstractConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) show impressive performance for image classification and detection, extending heavily to the medical image domain. Nevertheless, medical experts are skeptical in these predictions as the nonlinear multilayer structure resulting in a classification outcome is not directly graspable. Recently, approaches have been shown which help the user to understand the discriminative regions within an image which are decisive for the CNN to conclude to a certain class. Although these approaches could help to build trust in the CNNs predictions, they are only slightly shown to work with medical image data which often poses a challenge as the decision for a class relies on different lesion areas scattered around the entire image. Using the DiaretDB1 dataset, we show that on retina images different lesion areas fundamental for diabetic retinopathy are detected on an image level with high accuracy, comparable or exceeding supervised methods. On lesion level, we achieve few false positives with high sensitivity, though, the network is solely trained on image-level labels which do not include information about existing lesions. Classifying between diseased and healthy images, we achieve an AUC of 0.954 on the DiaretDB1. Muhammad Waleed Gondal, Jan M. Köhler, René Grzeszick, Gernot A. Fink, Michael Hirsch 0001 |
ICIP | 2 |