Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evan Patterson

dblp:202/2337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.412019
Conformalized Quantile Regression · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › quantile regression
conformal quantile regression
0.412019
Conformalized Quantile Regression · NeurIPS 2019
Program analysis
data flow analysis
0.312018
Semantic Representation of Data Science Programs · IJCAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112018
Semantic Representation of Data Science Programs · IJCAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program analysis · 0.7knowledge representation · 0.7quantile regression · 0.4conformal prediction · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Visualizing the Dynamics of Neuroevolution with Genetic Distance Projections
abstract
Evolutionary algorithms have shown substantial progress in recent years, especially in neural architecture search applications, or neuroevolution. Despite their effectiveness, analyzing and understanding the evolutionary paths these algorithms traverse to reach solutions remains challenging. Often these algorithms involve distributed computing strategies, which can include subpopulations or islands, and they explore massive or even unbounded search spaces which can include both weights and architecture, in both continuous and non-continuous domains. Manually examining individual solutions to understand the evolutionary dynamics is often infeasible due to large population sizes, large genome sizes, and high generation counts. This work introduces a new methodology for visualizing neuroevolution population dynamics called genetic distance projections, along with a novel neural network based method for generating these representations. We evaluate this methodology empirically and find it performs better than other traditional methods in generating these representations. We further validate the usefulness of these visualizations using case studies from EXAMM, a long standing neuroevolution algorithm, in which one case study even led to finding and fixing a bug in EXAMM's algorithm.
Evan Patterson, Joshua Karnas, Zimeng Lyu, Travis J. Desell
GECCO1
2025 Automating Transfer of Robot Task Plans Using Functorial Data Migrations
abstract
This paper introduces a novel approach to ontology-based robot plan transfer by leveraging functorial data migrations, a structured mapping method derived from category theory. Functors provide structured maps between planning domain ontologies which enables the transfer of task plans without the need for replanning. Unlike methods tailored to specific plans, our framework applies universally within the source domain once a structured map is defined. We demonstrate this approach by transferring a task plan from the canonical Blocksworld domain to one compatible with the AI2-THOR Kitchen environment. Additionally, we discuss practical limitations, propose benchmarks for evaluating symbolic plan transfer methods, and outline future directions for scaling this approach.
Angeline Aguinaldo, Evan Patterson, William C. Regli
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng.2
2023 Computational category-theoretic rewriting
Kristopher Brown, Evan Patterson, Tyler Hanks, James P. Fairbanks
J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program.2
2022 Computational Category-Theoretic Rewriting
Kristopher Brown, Evan Patterson, Tyler Hanks, James P. Fairbanks
ICGT2
2020 String Diagrams for Assembly Planning
Jade Master, Evan Patterson, Shahin Yousfi, Arquimedes Canedo
Diagrams2
2019 Conformalized Quantile Regression
abstract
Conformal prediction is a technique for constructing prediction intervals that attain valid coverage in finite samples, without making distributional assumptions. Despite this appeal, existing conformal methods can be unnecessarily conservative because they form intervals of constant or weakly varying length across the input space. In this paper we propose a new method that is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. It combines conformal prediction with classical quantile regression, inheriting the advantages of both. We establish a theoretical guarantee of valid coverage, supplemented by extensive experiments on popular regression datasets. We compare the efficiency of conformalized quantile regression to other conformal methods, showing that our method tends to produce shorter intervals.
Yaniv Romano, Evan Patterson, Emmanuel J. Candès
NeurIPS2
2018 Semantic Representation of Data Science Programs
abstract
Your computer is continuously executing programs, but does it really understand them? Not in any meaningful sense. That burden falls upon human knowledge workers, who are increasingly asked to write and understand code. They would benefit greatly from intelligent tools that reveal the connections between their code and its subject matter. Towards this prospect, we present an AI system that forms semantic representations of computer programs, using techniques from knowledge representation and program analysis. These representations are created through a novel algorithm for the semantic enrichment of dataflow graphs. We illustrate its workings with examples from the field of data science. The algorithm is undergirded by a new ontology language for modeling computer programs and a new ontology about data science, written in this language.
Evan Patterson, Ioana Baldini, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Kush R. Varshney
IJCAI1