Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Evan Patterson
dblp:202/2337
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Conformalized Quantile Regression · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › quantile regression
conformal quantile regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Conformalized Quantile Regression · NeurIPS 2019 |
Program analysis
data flow analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Semantic Representation of Data Science Programs · IJCAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Semantic Representation of Data Science Programs · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program analysis · 0.7knowledge representation · 0.7quantile regression · 0.4conformal prediction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Visualizing the Dynamics of Neuroevolution with Genetic Distance ProjectionsabstractEvolutionary algorithms have shown substantial progress in recent years, especially in neural architecture search applications, or neuroevolution. Despite their effectiveness, analyzing and understanding the evolutionary paths these algorithms traverse to reach solutions remains challenging. Often these algorithms involve distributed computing strategies, which can include subpopulations or islands, and they explore massive or even unbounded search spaces which can include both weights and architecture, in both continuous and non-continuous domains. Manually examining individual solutions to understand the evolutionary dynamics is often infeasible due to large population sizes, large genome sizes, and high generation counts. This work introduces a new methodology for visualizing neuroevolution population dynamics called genetic distance projections, along with a novel neural network based method for generating these representations. We evaluate this methodology empirically and find it performs better than other traditional methods in generating these representations. We further validate the usefulness of these visualizations using case studies from EXAMM, a long standing neuroevolution algorithm, in which one case study even led to finding and fixing a bug in EXAMM's algorithm. Evan Patterson, Joshua Karnas, Zimeng Lyu, Travis J. Desell |
GECCO | 1 |
| 2025 | Automating Transfer of Robot Task Plans Using Functorial Data MigrationsabstractThis paper introduces a novel approach to ontology-based robot plan transfer by leveraging functorial data migrations, a structured mapping method derived from category theory. Functors provide structured maps between planning domain ontologies which enables the transfer of task plans without the need for replanning. Unlike methods tailored to specific plans, our framework applies universally within the source domain once a structured map is defined. We demonstrate this approach by transferring a task plan from the canonical Blocksworld domain to one compatible with the AI2-THOR Kitchen environment. Additionally, we discuss practical limitations, propose benchmarks for evaluating symbolic plan transfer methods, and outline future directions for scaling this approach. Angeline Aguinaldo, Evan Patterson, William C. Regli |
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng. | 2 |
| 2023 | Computational category-theoretic rewriting
Kristopher Brown, Evan Patterson, Tyler Hanks, James P. Fairbanks |
J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program. | 2 |
| 2022 | Computational Category-Theoretic Rewriting
Kristopher Brown, Evan Patterson, Tyler Hanks, James P. Fairbanks |
ICGT | 2 |
| 2020 | String Diagrams for Assembly Planning
Jade Master, Evan Patterson, Shahin Yousfi, Arquimedes Canedo |
Diagrams | 2 |
| 2019 | Conformalized Quantile RegressionabstractConformal prediction is a technique for constructing prediction intervals that attain valid coverage in finite samples, without making distributional assumptions. Despite this appeal, existing conformal methods can be unnecessarily conservative because they form intervals of constant or weakly varying length across the input space. In this paper we propose a new method that is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. It combines conformal prediction with classical quantile regression, inheriting the advantages of both. We establish a theoretical guarantee of valid coverage, supplemented by extensive experiments on popular regression datasets. We compare the efficiency of conformalized quantile regression to other conformal methods, showing that our method tends to produce shorter intervals. Yaniv Romano, Evan Patterson, Emmanuel J. Candès |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Semantic Representation of Data Science ProgramsabstractYour computer is continuously executing programs, but does it really understand them? Not in any meaningful sense. That burden falls upon human knowledge workers, who are increasingly asked to write and understand code. They would benefit greatly from intelligent tools that reveal the connections between their code and its subject matter. Towards this prospect, we present an AI system that forms semantic representations of computer programs, using techniques from knowledge representation and program analysis. These representations are created through a novel algorithm for the semantic enrichment of dataflow graphs. We illustrate its workings with examples from the field of data science. The algorithm is undergirded by a new ontology language for modeling computer programs and a new ontology about data science, written in this language. Evan Patterson, Ioana Baldini, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Kush R. Varshney |
IJCAI | 1 |