Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Pachl

dblp:202/2490 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 70% Network management and operations · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.011988
Livelocks in slotted ring networks · INFOCOM 1988
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol design
0.011988
Livelocks in slotted ring networks · INFOCOM 1988
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network
ring network
0.011988
Livelocks in slotted ring networks · INFOCOM 1988
Internet architecture and protocols › link-layer protocols
ring network protocols
0.011988
Livelocks in slotted ring networks · INFOCOM 1988
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Semipullbacks of labelled Markov processes
Jan Pachl, Pedro Sánchez Terraf
Log. Methods Comput. Sci.1
1988 Livelocks in slotted ring networks
abstract
The authors presents a problem that arises in the design of protocols for ring networks. It is shown that some existing and proposed protocols can reach a livelocked state as a result of a single transmission error. Livelock-free modifications of the protocols are described. The protocols covered fall into two classes: those in which error recovery utilizes a unique monitor station, and those in which all stations in the ring follow the same algorithm (decentralized protocols). It is shown that although the simplest protocol in each class is susceptible to livelocks, there are some nonobvious differences between the two classes. The problem is outlined and the assumptions made are also presented. Protocols with a monitor station are studied along with decentralized protocols. An example is given of a livelock. Informal arguments are used to show that the modifications proposed are livelock-free.>
Jan Pachl
INFOCOM1