EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wilson Ye Chen
dblp:202/2491
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Algorithms and data structures · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 92% Optimization for machine learning · 8% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stein Point Markov Chain Monte Carlo · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stein Point Markov Chain Monte Carlo · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Stein Points · ICML 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
importance sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadrature · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis › numerical integration › quadrature rules
kernel quadrature |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadrature · ICML 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
monte carlo methods |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadrature · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
numerical integration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadrature · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Stein Point Markov Chain Monte Carlo · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stein discrepancy · 0.8markov chain sampling · 0.8kernel stein discrepancy · 0.3greedy method · 0.3conditional gradient method · 0.3sequential monte carlo · 0.3bayesian monte carlo · 0.3adaptive tempering · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive MCMCabstractAn informal observation, made by several authors, is that the adaptive design of a Markov transition kernel has the flavour of a reinforcement learning task. Yet, to-date it has remained unclear how to exploit modern reinforcement learning technologies for adaptive MCMC. The aim of this paper is to set out a general framework, called \emph{Reinforcement Learning Metropolis—Hastings}, that is theoretically supported and empirically validated. Our principal focus is on learning fast-mixing Metropolis—Hastings transition kernels, which we cast as deterministic policies and optimise via a policy gradient. Control of the learning rate provably ensures conditions for ergodicity are satisfied. The methodology is used to construct a gradient-free sampler that out-performs a popular gradient-free adaptive Metropolis–Hastings algorithm on $\approx$90% of tasks in the \emph{PosteriorDB} benchmark. Congye Wang, Wilson Ye Chen, Heishiro Kanagawa, Chris J. Oates |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2023 | Stein Π-Importance Sampling
Congye Wang, Wilson Ye Chen, Heishiro Kanagawa, Chris J. Oates |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Stein Point Markov Chain Monte CarloabstractAn important task in machine learning and statistics is the approximation of a probability measure by an empirical measure supported on a discrete point set. Stein Points are a class of algorithms for this task, which proceed by sequentially minimising a Stein discrepancy between the empirical measure and the target and, hence, require the solution of a non-convex optimisation problem to obtain each new point. This paper removes the need to solve this optimisation problem by, instead, selecting each new point based on a Markov chain sample path. This significantly reduces the computational cost of Stein Points and leads to a suite of algorithms that are straightforward to implement. The new algorithms are illustrated on a set of challenging Bayesian inference problems, and rigorous theoretical guarantees of consistency are established. Wilson Ye Chen, Alessandro Barp, François-Xavier Briol, Jackson Gorham, Mark A. Girolami, Lester Mackey, Chris J. Oates |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Stein PointsabstractAn important task in computational statistics and machine learning is to approximate a posterior distribution $p(x)$ with an empirical measure supported on a set of representative points $\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n$. This paper focuses on methods where the selection of points is essentially deterministic, with an emphasis on achieving accurate approximation when $n$ is small. To this end, we present Stein Points. The idea is to exploit either a greedy or a conditional gradient method to iteratively minimise a kernel Stein discrepancy between the empirical measure and $p(x)$. Our empirical results demonstrate that Stein Points enable accurate approximation of the posterior at modest computational cost. In addition, theoretical results are provided to establish convergence of the method. Wilson Ye Chen, Lester Mackey, Jackson Gorham, François-Xavier Briol, Chris J. Oates |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | On the Sampling Problem for Kernel QuadratureabstractThe standard Kernel Quadrature method for numerical integration with random point sets (also called Bayesian Monte Carlo) is known to converge in root mean square error at a rate determined by the ratio s/d, where s and d encode the smoothness and dimension of the integrand. However, an empirical investigation reveals that the rate constant C is highly sensitive to the distribution of the random points. In contrast to standard Monte Carlo integration, for which optimal importance sampling is well-understood, the sampling distribution that minimises C for Kernel Quadrature does not admit a closed form. This paper argues that the practical choice of sampling distribution is an important open problem. One solution is considered; a novel automatic approach based on adaptive tempering and sequential Monte Carlo. Empirical results demonstrate a dramatic reduction in integration error of up to 4 orders of magnitude can be achieved with the proposed method. François-Xavier Briol, Chris J. Oates, Jon Cockayne, Wilson Ye Chen, Mark A. Girolami |
ICML | 4 |