Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Enis Golaszewski
dblp:202/2540
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0814-9956ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
secure system design |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Analysis of the Security Design, Engineering, and Implementation of the SecureDNA System · NDSS 2026 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Analysis of the Security Design, Engineering, and Implementation of the SecureDNA System
Alan T. Sherman, Jeremy J. Romanik Romano, Edward Zieglar, Enis Golaszewski, Jonathan D. Fuchs, William E. Byrd |
NDSS | 4 |
| 2023 | Psychometric Evaluation of the Cybersecurity Curriculum AssessmentabstractWe present a psychometric evaluation of the Cybersecurity Curriculum Assessment (CCA), completed by 193 students from seven colleges and universities. The CCA builds on our prior work developing and validating a Cybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI), which measures students' conceptual understanding of cybersecurity after a first course in the area. The CCA deepens the conceptual complexity and technical depth expectations, assessing conceptual knowledge of students who had completed multiple courses in cybersecurity. We review our development of the CCA and present our evaluation of the instrument using Classical Test Theory and Item-Response Theory. The CCA is a difficult assessment, providing reliable measurements of student knowledge and deeper information about high-performing students. Geoffrey L. Herman, Shan Huang 0008, Peter Peterson, Linda Oliva, Enis Golaszewski, Alan T. Sherman |
SIGCSE (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | Psychometric Evaluation of the Cybersecurity Concept InventoryabstractWe present a psychometric evaluation of a revised version of theCybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI), completed by 354 students from 29 colleges and universities. The CCI is a conceptual test of understanding created to enable research on instruction quality in cybersecurity education. This work extends previous expert review and small-scale pilot testing of the CCI. Results show that the CCI aligns with a curriculum many instructors expect from an introductory cybersecurity course, and that it is a valid and reliable tool for assessing what conceptual cybersecurity knowledge students learned. Seth Poulsen, Geoffrey L. Herman, Peter Peterson, Enis Golaszewski, Akshita Gorti, Linda Oliva, Travis Scheponik, Alan T. Sherman |
ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. | 4 |
| 2019 | Initial Validation of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory: Pilot Testing and Expert ReviewabstractWe analyze expert review and student performance data to evaluate the validity of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI) for assessing student knowledge of core cybersecurity concepts after a first course on the topic. A panel of 12 experts in cybersecurity reviewed the CCI, and 142 students from six different institutions took the CCI as a pilot test. The panel reviewed each item of the CCI and the overwhelming majority rated every item as measuring appropriate cybersecurity knowledge. We administered the CCI to students taking a first cybersecurity course either online or proctored by the course instructor. We applied classical test theory to evaluate the quality of the CCI. This evaluation showed that the CCI is sufficiently reliable for measuring student knowledge of cybersecurity and that the CCI may be too difficult as a whole. We describe the results of the expert review and the pilot test and provide recommendations for the continued improvement of the CCI. Spencer Offenberger, Geoffrey L. Herman, Peter Peterson, Alan T. Sherman, Enis Golaszewski, Travis Scheponik, Linda Oliva |
FIE | 5 |