Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carsten Rothe
dblp:202/3333
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design
optoelectronic devices |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Singlet Generation Yields in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes · Proc. IEEE 2009 |
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices › organic electronics
organic light-emitting diodes |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Singlet Generation Yields in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes · Proc. IEEE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spin statistics · 0.1direct measurement · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Singlet Generation Yields in Organic Light-Emitting DiodesabstractA major potential difference between polymer and small molecule organic light-emitting devices is the possibility of spin-dependent charge recombination in the latter. In this case, the singlet exciton formation yield, one of the key parameters that determines device efficiencies, deviates from the simple quantum mechanical spin statistics prediction of 25%. For polymers, the departure from this limit has been demonstrated by several indirect measurements yielding a wide spread values from 25% up to 95% and by ourselves using a direct measurement on working devices at 44%. These results clearly indicate that polymer-based devices hold a unique advantage over small molecule-based devices. Comment will be made to these various measurement techniques along with an insight into current theoretical ideas that can explain the departure from the quantum spin statistical limit. Andy P. Monkman, Carsten Rothe, Simon M. King |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |