Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiacheng Liu 0003
dblp:202/3902-3
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-3807-3817ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 91% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No-Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Visual Edge Model and AdaBoosting Neural Network · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
no-reference quality assessment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No-Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Visual Edge Model and AdaBoosting Neural Network · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment › objective image quality assessment
screen content image quality assessment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No-Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Visual Edge Model and AdaBoosting Neural Network · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | No-Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Visual Edge Model and AdaBoosting Neural Network · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
l-moments distribution estimation · 0.5difference of gaussian · 0.5adaboosting neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | No Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Stacked Autoencoders in Pictorial and Textual RegionsabstractRecently, the visual quality evaluation of screen content images (SCIs) has become an important and timely emerging research theme. This article presents an effective and novel blind quality evaluation metric for SCIs by using stacked autoencoders (SAE) based on pictorial and textual regions. Since the SCI consists of not only the pictorial area but also the textual area, the human visual system (HVS) is not equally sensitive to their different distortion types. First, the textual and pictorial regions can be obtained by dividing an input SCI via an SCI segmentation metric. Next, we extract quality-aware features from the textual region and pictorial region, respectively. Then, two different SAEs are trained via an unsupervised approach for quality-aware features that are extracted from these two regions. After the training procedure of the SAEs, the quality-aware features can evolve into more discriminative and meaningful features. Subsequently, the evolved features and their corresponding subjective scores are input into two regressors for training. Each regressor can obtain one output predictive score. Finally, the final perceptual quality score of a test SCI is computed by these two predicted scores via a weighted model. Experimental results on two public SCI-oriented databases have revealed that the proposed scheme can compare favorably with the existing blind image quality assessment metrics. Yang Zhao 0027, Jiacheng Liu 0003, Bin Jiang 0003, Qinggang Meng, Wen Lu 0004, Xinbo Gao 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Cybern. | 3 |
| 2021 | No-Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images Using Visual Edge Model and AdaBoosting Neural NetworkabstractIn this paper, a competitive no-reference metric is proposed to assess the perceptive quality of screen content images (SCIs), which uses the human visual edge model and AdaBoosting neural network. Inspired by the existing theory that the edge information which reflects the visual quality of SCI is effectively captured by the human visual difference of the Gaussian (DOG) model, we compute two types of multi-scale edge maps via the DOG operator firstly. Specifically, two types of edge maps contain contour and edge information respectively. Then after locally normalizing edge maps, L -moments distribution estimation is utilized to fit their DOG coefficients, and the fitted L -moments parameters can be regarded as edge features. Finally, to obtain the final perceptive quality score, we use an AdaBoosting back-propagation neural network (ABPNN) to map the quality-aware features to the perceptual quality score of SCIs. The reason why the ABPNN is regarded as the appropriate approach for the visual quality assessment of SCIs is that we abandon the regression network with a shallow structure, try a regression network with a deep architecture, and achieve a good generalization ability. The proposed method delivers highly competitive performance and shows high consistency with the human visual system (HVS) on the public SCI-oriented databases. Zilin Bian, Jiacheng Liu 0003, Bin Jiang 0003, Wen Lu 0004, Xinbo Gao 0001, Houbing Song |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 3 |
| 2018 | No reference quality evaluation for screen content images considering texture feature based on sparse representation
Jiacheng Liu 0003, Bin Jiang 0003, Wen Lu 0004 |
Signal Process. | 2 |