Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gil Lederman
dblp:202/3924
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Branching Heuristics for Propositional Model Counting · AAAI 2021 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model counting
propositional model counting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Branching Heuristics for Propositional Model Counting · AAAI 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › heuristic generation
heuristic learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Heuristics for Quantified Boolean Formulas through Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
quantified boolean formula |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Heuristics for Quantified Boolean Formulas through Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › quantified boolean formula
quantified boolean formula solving |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Heuristics for Quantified Boolean Formulas through Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.9machine learning · 0.5branching heuristic learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Does the Performance of Text-to-Image Retrieval Models Generalize Beyond Captions-as-a-Query?
Juan Manuel Rodriguez, Nima Tavassoli, Eliezer Levy, Gil Lederman, Dima Sivov, Matteo Lissandrini, Davide Mottin |
ECIR (4) | 4 |
| 2021 | Learning Branching Heuristics for Propositional Model CountingabstractPropositional model counting, or #SAT, is the problem of computing the number of satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula. Many problems from different application areas, including many discrete probabilistic inference problems, can be translated into model counting problems to be solved by #SAT solvers. Exact #SAT solvers, however, are often not scalable to industrial size instances. In this paper, we present Neuro#, an approach for learning branching heuristics to improve the performance of exact #SAT solvers on instances from a given family of problems. We experimentally show that our method reduces the step count on similarly distributed held-out instances and generalizes to much larger instances from the same problem family. It is able to achieve these results on a number of different problem families having very different structures. In addition to step count improvements, Neuro# can also achieve orders of magnitude wall-clock speedups over the vanilla solver on larger instances in some problem families, despite the runtime overhead of querying the model. Pashootan Vaezipoor, Gil Lederman, Yuhuai Wu, Chris J. Maddison, Roger B. Grosse, Sanjit A. Seshia, Fahiem Bacchus |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning Heuristics for Quantified Boolean Formulas through Reinforcement Learning
Gil Lederman, Markus N. Rabe, Sanjit A. Seshia, Edward A. Lee |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Gordian: Formal Reasoning-based Outlier Detection for Secure LocalizationabstractAccurate localization from Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) is a critical enabling technology for context-aware applications and control. As localization plays an increasingly safety-critical role, location systems must be able to identify and eliminate faulty measurements to prevent dangerously inaccurate localization. In this article, we consider the range-based localization problem and propose a method to detect coordinated adversarial corruption on anchor positions and distance measurements. Our algorithm, G ordian , rapidly finds attacks by identifying geometric inconsistencies at the graph level without requiring assumptions about hardware, ranging mechanisms, or cryptographic protocols. We give necessary conditions for which attack detection is guaranteed to be successful in the noiseless case, and we use that intuition to extend G ordian to the noisy case where fewer guarantees are possible. In simulations generated from real-world sensor noise, we empirically show that G ordian ’s trilateration counterexample generation procedure enables rapid attack detection even for combinatorially difficult problems. Matthew Weber, Baihong Jin, Gil Lederman, Yasser Shoukry, Edward A. Lee, Sanjit A. Seshia, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli |
ACM Trans. Cyber Phys. Syst. | 3 |