Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John Urschel
dblp:202/4229 · also John C. Urschel
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5401-821XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 25% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Computational complexity · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 54% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational geometry
graph drawing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multidimensional Scaling: Approximation and Complexity · ICML 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
multidimensional scaling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multidimensional Scaling: Approximation and Complexity · ICML 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multidimensional Scaling: Approximation and Complexity · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
determinantal point process |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles · ICML 2017 Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
optimal sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multidimensional scaling · 0.5gradient-based optimization · 0.5method of moments · 0.3local likelihood geometry · 0.3combinatorial algorithm · 0.3asymptotic variance analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Multidimensional Scaling: Approximation and ComplexityabstractMetric Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a classical method for generating meaningful (non-linear) low-dimensional embeddings of high-dimensional data. MDS has a long history in the statistics, machine learning, and graph drawing communities. In particular, the Kamada-Kawai force-directed graph drawing method is equivalent to MDS and is one of the most popular ways in practice to embed graphs into low dimensions. Despite its ubiquity, our theoretical understanding of MDS remains limited as its objective function is highly non-convex. In this paper, we prove that minimizing the Kamada-Kawai objective is NP-hard and give a provable approximation algorithm for optimizing it, which in particular is a PTAS on low-diameter graphs. We supplement this result with experiments suggesting possible connections between our greedy approximation algorithm and gradient-based methods. Erik D. Demaine, Adam Hesterberg, Frederic Koehler, Jayson Lynch, John Urschel |
ICML | 5 |
| 2021 | Testing gap k-planarity is NP-complete
John Urschel, Jake Wellens |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |
| 2017 | Rates of estimation for determinantal point processesabstractDeterminantal point processes (DPPs) have wide-ranging applications in machine learning, where they are used to enforce the notion of diversity in subset selection problems. Many estimators have been proposed, but surprisingly the basic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) have received little attention. In this paper, we study the local geometry of the expected log-likelihood function to prove several rates of convergence for the MLE. We also give a complete characterization of the case where the MLE converges at a parametric rate. Even in the latter case, we also exhibit a potential curse of dimensionality where the asymptotic variance of the MLE is exponentially large in the dimension of the problem. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Ankur Moitra, Philippe Rigollet, John Urschel |
COLT | 4 |
| 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and CyclesabstractDeterminantal Point Processes (DPPs) are a family of probabilistic models that have a repulsive behavior, and lend themselves naturally to many tasks in machine learning where returning a diverse set of objects is important. While there are fast algorithms for sampling, marginalization and conditioning, much less is known about learning the parameters of a DPP. Our contribution is twofold: (i) we establish the optimal sample complexity achievable in this problem and show that it is governed by a natural parameter, which we call the cycle sparsity; (ii) we propose a provably fast combinatorial algorithm that implements the method of moments efficiently and achieves optimal sample complexity. Finally, we give experimental results that confirm our theoretical findings. John Urschel, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Ankur Moitra, Philippe Rigollet |
ICML | 1 |