Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Darryl C. Jarman
dblp:202/5123 · also Darryl Jarman
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-4039-4812ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Debugging and program repair · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
bug localization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Legion: Massively Composing Rankers for Improved Bug Localization at Adobe · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Debugging and program repair
fault localization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Legion: Massively Composing Rankers for Improved Bug Localization at Adobe · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.6ensemble learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Legion: Massively Composing Rankers for Improved Bug Localization at AdobeabstractStudies have estimated that, in industrial settings, developers spend between 30 and 90 percent of their time fixing bugs. As such, tools that assist in identifying the location of bugs provide value by reducing debugging costs. One such tool is BugLocator. This study initially aimed to determine if developers working on the Adobe Analytics product could use BugLocator. The initial results show that BugLocator achieves a similar accuracy on five of seven Adobe Analytics repositories and on open-source projects. However, these results do not meet the minimum applicability requirement deemed necessary by Adobe Analytics developers prior to possible adoption. Thus, we consequently examine how BugLocator can achieve the targeted accuracy with two extensions: (1) adding more data corpora, and (2) massively composing individual rankers consisting of augmented BugLocator instances trained on various combinations of corpora and parameter configurations with a Random Forest model. We refer to our final extension as Legion. On average, applying Legion to Adobe Analytics repositories results in at least one buggy file ranked in the top-ten recommendations 76.8 percent of the time for customer-reported bugs across all 7 repositories. This represents a substantial improvement over BugLocator of 36.4 percent, and satisfies the minimum applicability requirement. Additionally, our extensions boost Mean Average Precision by 107.7 percent, Mean Reciprocal Rank by 86.1 percent, Top 1 by 143.4 percent and Top 5 by 58.1 percent. Darryl C. Jarman, Riley Smith, Ferdian Thung, David Lo 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2020 | Program Slicing and Execution Tracing for Differential Testing at Adobe AnalyticsabstractThis paper reports on the use of program slicing concepts and partial execution tracing at Adobe Analytics to address a major limitation of differential testing --- namely, how to deal with the large numbers of differences typically produced by this regression testing technique. Manual verification, typically used to verify detected differences, is tedious, time-consuming and error-prone. This severely limits the volume of testing that can be done and thereby reduces adoption of differential testing. It is hoped that, by sharing this experience, researchers with expertise in program slicing might be motivated to help solve some of the issues and limitations encountered during this novel application of slicing to a real-world industrial problem. Darryl C. Jarman, Scott Hunt, Dave Towey |
ICPC | 1 |