Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giuseppe Milazzo

dblp:202/5534 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-3338-6188ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 70% Motion planning and robot control · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant actuation
0.912025
Design, Characterization, and Validation of a Variable Stiffness Prosthetic Elbow · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › wearable robotics
prosthetic device
0.912025
Design, Characterization, and Validation of a Variable Stiffness Prosthetic Elbow · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design › compliant actuator
variable stiffness actuation
0.912025
Design, Characterization, and Validation of a Variable Stiffness Prosthetic Elbow · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation
physical human-robot interaction
0.312025
Design, Characterization, and Validation of a Variable Stiffness Prosthetic Elbow · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variable stiffness actuator design · 0.9agonist-antagonist layout · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Design, Characterization, and Validation of a Variable Stiffness Prosthetic Elbow
abstract
Intuitively, prostheses with user-controllable stiffness could mimic the intrinsic behavior of the human musculoskeletal system, promoting safe and natural interactions and task adaptability in real-world scenarios. However, prosthetic design often disregards compliance because of the additional complexity, weight, and needed control channels. This article focuses on designing a variable stiffness actuator (VSA) with weight, size, and performance compatible with prosthetic applications, addressing its implementation for the elbow joint. While a direct biomimetic approach suggests adopting an agonist-antagonist (AA) layout to replicate the biceps and triceps brachii with elastic actuation, this solution is not optimal to accommodate the varied morphologies of residual limbs. Instead, we employed the AA layout to craft an elbow prosthesis fully contained in the user's forearm, catering to individuals with distal transhumeral amputations. In addition, we introduce a variant of this design where the two motors are split in the upper arm and forearm to distribute mass and volume more evenly along the bionic limb, enhancing comfort for patients with more proximal amputation levels. We characterize and validate our approach, demonstrating that both architectures meet the target requirements for an elbow prosthesis. The system attains the desired 120$^{\circ }$range of motion, achieves the target stiffness range of [2, 60] N$\cdot$m/rad, and can actively lift up to 3 kg. Our novel design reduces weight by up to 50% compared to existing VSAs for elbow prostheses while achieving performance comparable to the state of the art. Case studies suggest that passive and variable compliance could enable robust and safe interactions and task adaptability in the real world.
Giuseppe Milazzo, Simon Lemerle, Giorgio Grioli, Antonio Bicchi, Manuel G. Catalano
IEEE Trans. Robotics1