Riccardo Bonalli

dblp:202/5729 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2561-1804ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Reinforcement learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 5%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Mathematical optimization · 46%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe exploration
0.912025
Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.912025
Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
system identification
0.912025
Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › optimal motion planning
asymptotically optimal motion planning
0.412020
Refined Analysis of Asymptotically-Optimal Kinodynamic Planning in the State-Cost Space · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
kinodynamic planning
0.412020
Refined Analysis of Asymptotically-Optimal Kinodynamic Planning in the State-Cost Space · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.412020
Refined Analysis of Asymptotically-Optimal Kinodynamic Planning in the State-Cost Space · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
sequential convex programming
0.412019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.412019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety › safety assurance
safety verification
0.312025
Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › reactive motion generation
riemannian motion policies
0.112021
Composable Geometric Motion Policies using Multi-Task Pullback Bundle Dynamical Systems · ICRA 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
task composition
0.112021
Composable Geometric Motion Policies using Multi-Task Pullback Bundle Dynamical Systems · ICRA 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonparametric regression · 0.9kernel-based confidence bounds · 0.9adaptive learning rate · 0.9state-cost space analysis · 0.9lipschitz continuity analysis · 0.9sequential convex programming · 0.8indirect optimal control · 0.8riemannian metrics · 0.5geometric optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics
abstract
We address the problem of safely learning controlled stochastic dynamics from discrete-time trajectory observations, ensuring system trajectories remain within predefined safe regions during both training and deployment. Safety-critical constraints of this kind are crucial in applications such as autonomous robotics, finance, and biomedicine. We introduce a method that ensures safe exploration and efficient estimation of system dynamics by iteratively expanding an initial known safe control set using kernel-based confidence bounds. After training, the learned model enables predictions of the system's dynamics and permits safety verification of any given control. Our approach requires only mild smoothness assumptions and access to an initial safe control set, enabling broad applicability to complex real-world systems. We provide theoretical guarantees for safety and derive adaptive learning rates that improve with increasing Sobolev regularity of the true dynamics. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the practical effectiveness of our method in terms of safety, estimation accuracy, and computational efficiency.
Luc Motte, Alessandro Rudi, Riccardo Bonalli
NeurIPS3
2025 Estimating the Convex Hull of the Image of a Set with Smooth Boundary: Error Bounds and Applications
Thomas Lew, Riccardo Bonalli, Lucas Janson, Marco Pavone 0001
Discret. Comput. Geom.2
2021 Composable Geometric Motion Policies using Multi-Task Pullback Bundle Dynamical Systems
abstract
Despite decades of work in fast reactive planning and control, challenges remain in developing reactive motion policies on non-Euclidean manifolds and enforcing constraints while avoiding undesirable potential function local minima. This work presents a principled method for designing and fusing desired robot task behaviors into a stable robot motion policy, leveraging the geometric structure of non-Euclidean manifolds, which are prevalent in robot configuration and task spaces. Our Pullback Bundle Dynamical Systems (PBDS) framework drives desired task behaviors and prioritizes tasks using separate position-dependent and position/velocity-dependent Riemannian metrics, respectively, thus simplifying individual task design and modular composition of tasks. For enforcing constraints, we provide a class of metric-based tasks, eliminating local minima by imposing non-conflicting potential functions only for goal region attraction. We also provide a geometric optimization problem for combining tasks inspired by Riemannian Motion Policies (RMPs) that reduces to a simple least-squares problem, and we show that our approach is geometrically well-defined. We demonstrate the PBDS framework on the sphere S2and at 300-500 Hz on a manipulator arm, and we provide task design guidance and an open-source Julia library implementation. Overall, this work presents a fast, easy-to-use framework for generating motion policies without unwanted potential function local minima on general manifolds.
Andrew Bylard, Riccardo Bonalli, Marco Pavone 0001
ICRA2
2020 Refined Analysis of Asymptotically-Optimal Kinodynamic Planning in the State-Cost Space
abstract
We present a novel analysis of AO-RRT: a tree-based planner for motion planning with kinodynamic constraints, originally described by Hauser and Zhou (AO-X, 2016). AO-RRT explores the state-cost space and has been shown to efficiently obtain high-quality solutions in practice without relying on the availability of a computationally-intensive two-point boundary-value solver. Our main contribution is an optimality proof for the single-tree version of the algorithm-a variant that was not analyzed before. Our proof only requires a mild and easily-verifiable set of assumptions on the problem and system: Lipschitz-continuity of the cost function and the dynamics. In particular, we prove that for any system satisfying these assumptions, any trajectory having a piecewise-constant control function and positive clearance from the obstacles can be approximated arbitrarily well by a trajectory found by AORRT. We also discuss practical aspects of AORRT and present experimental comparisons of variants of the algorithm.
Michal Kleinbort, Edgar Granados, Kiril Solovey, Riccardo Bonalli, Kostas E. Bekris, Dan Halperin
ICRA4
2019 GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming
abstract
Sequential Convex Programming (SCP) has recently seen a surge of interest as a tool for trajectory optimization. However, most available methods lack rigorous performance guarantees and they are often tailored to specific optimal control setups. In this paper, we present GuSTO (Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization), an algorithmic framework to solve trajectory optimization problems for control-affine systems with drift. GuSTO generalizes earlier SCP-based methods for trajectory optimization (by addressing, for example, goal-set constraints and problems with either fixed or free final time) and enjoys theoretical convergence guarantees in terms of convergence to, at least, a stationary point. The theoretical analysis is further leveraged to devise an accelerated implementation of GuSTO, which originally infuses ideas from indirect optimal control into an SCP context. Numerical experiments on a variety of trajectory optimization setups show that GuSTO generally outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches in terms of success rates, solution quality, and computation times.
Riccardo Bonalli, Abhishek Cauligi, Andrew Bylard, Marco Pavone 0001
ICRA1