Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jane Wyngaard
dblp:202/6688
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-7877-2391ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis › dynamic analysis
runtime monitoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Interlocking Safety Cases for Unmanned Autonomous Systems in Shared Airspaces · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2021 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Interlocking Safety Cases for Unmanned Autonomous Systems in Shared Airspaces · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2021 |
Embedded and real-time systems › cyber-physical system platforms
unmanned aerial vehicle |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Interlocking Safety Cases for Unmanned Autonomous Systems in Shared Airspaces · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
safety assurance cases · 1.5runtime monitoring · 1.5reputation model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Interlocking Safety Cases for Unmanned Autonomous Systems in Shared AirspacesabstractThe growing adoption of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for tasks such as eCommerce, aerial surveillance, and environmental monitoring introduces the need for new safety mechanisms in an increasingly cluttered airspace. In our work we thus emphasize safety issues that emerge at the intersection of infrastructures responsible for controlling the airspace, and the diverse UAVs operating in their space. We build on safety assurance cases (SAC) - a state-of-the-art solution for reasoning about safety - and propose a novel approach based on interlocking SACs. The infrastructure safety case (ISAC) specifies assumptions upon UAV behavior, while each UAV demonstrates compliance to the ISAC by presenting its own (pluggable) safety case (pSAC) which connects to the ISAC through a set of interlock points. To collect information on each UAV we enforce a “trust but monitor” policy, supported by runtime monitoring and an underlying reputation model. We evaluate our approach in three ways: first by developing ISACs for two UAV infrastructures, second by running simulations to evaluate end-to-end effectiveness, and finally via an outdoor field-study with physical UAVs. The results show that interlocking SACs can be effective for identifying, specifying, and monitoring safety-related constraints upon UAVs flying in a controlled airspace. Michael Vierhauser, Sean Bayley, Jane Wyngaard, Wandi Xiong, Jinghui Cheng 0001, Joshua Huseman, Robyn R. Lutz, Jane Cleland-Huang |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |
| 2019 | Cyberinfrastructure Center of Excellence Pilot: Connecting Large Facilities CyberinfrastructureabstractThe National Science Foundation's Large Facilities are major, multi-user research facilities that operate and manage sophisticated and diverse research instruments and platforms (e.g., large telescopes, interferometers, distributed sensor arrays) that serve a variety of scientific disciplines, from astronomy and physics to geology and biology and beyond. Large Facilities are increasingly dependent on advanced cyberinfrastructure (i.e., computing, data, and software systems; networking; and associated human capital) to enable the broad delivery and analysis of facility-generated data. These cyberinfrastructure tools enable scientists and the public to gain new insights into fundamental questions about the structure and history of the universe, the world we live in today, and how our environment may change in the coming decades. This paper describes a pilot project that aims to develop a model for a Cyberinfrastructure Center of Excellence (CI CoE) that facilitates community building and knowledge sharing and that disseminates and applies best practices and innovative solutions for facility CI. Ewa Deelman, Ryan Mitchell, Loïc Pottier, Mats Rynge, Erik Scott, Karan Vahi, Marina Kogan, Jasmine Mann, Tom Gulbransen, Daniel Allen, David Barlow, Anirban Mandal, Santiago Bonarrigo, Chris Clark, Leslie Goldman, Tristan Goulden, Phil Harvey, David Hulsander, Steve Jacobs, Christine Laney, Ivan Lobo-Padilla, Jeremy Sampson, Valerio Pascucci, John Staarmann, Steve Stone, Susan Sons, Jane Wyngaard, Charles Vardeman, Steve Petruzza, Ilya Baldin, Laura Christopherson |
eScience | 27 |