Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kuan-Yen Huang

dblp:202/9634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 89% Integrated circuit design · 11%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.722019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
asynchronous circuit testing
0.412019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
design for testability
0.312017
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.312017
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017
Integrated circuit design
asynchronous circuit design
0.222019
DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019
Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits · DAC 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vertex coloring · 0.4full-scan dft · 0.4ATPG · 0.4stuck-at test · 0.3scan design · 0.3delay test · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 DR-Scan: Dual-Rail Asynchronous Scan DfT and ATPG
abstract
Due to many state-holding elements in asynchronous circuits, many faults need two-pattern tests. This paper presents a test methodology (DR-scan) for dual-rail asynchronous circuits. Our design for testability is a full-scan, clock-less technique that supports both one-pattern and two-pattern tests for single stuck-at faults. DR-scan is able to test memory elements in dual-rail logic without breaking local feedback loops. To reduce test time, we choose a minimum set of selected test configurations (TCs). If there are more than one selected TCs, we need to split scan latches into multiple scan chains. To apply two-pattern tests, we partition the circuit using vertex coloring. With our test methodology, we can apply traditional full-scan automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) to generate two-pattern tests with high test coverage. Experimental results show our methodology can achieve test coverage up to nearly 94% for various asynchronous circuits.
Shih-An Hsieh, Ying-Hsu Wang, Ting-Yu Shen, Kuan-Yen Huang, Chia-Cheng Pai, Tsai-Chieh Chen, Chien-Mo James Li
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.4
2017 Test Methodology for Dual-rail Asynchronous Circuits
abstract
With low power and variation-tolerant features, asynchronous have been widely used in advanced VLSI designs. Testing asynchronous circuits has become a very important practical issue. This research presents new test methodology, including design for testability (DFT) and automatic test pattern generation (ATPG), for asynchronous dual-rail circuits. The proposed DAC-scan cell is a hazard-free scan design, which can be applied to various implementations of dual-rail asynchronous circuits. Two-pattern stuck-at test and three-pattern delay test techniques are presented to detect local feedback faults in the circuits without inserting extra DFT into feedback loops. With our test methodology, we can use traditional full-scan ATPG to generate high fault coverage test patterns. Moreover, designers can tradeoff between fault coverage and area overhead by using different versions of DAC-scan cells.
Kuan-Yen Huang, Ting-Yu Shen, Chien-Mo James Li
DAC1