Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shihua Lu

dblp:203/2406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0004-0003-243XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
information flow control
0.712023
Obtaining Information Leakage Bounds via Approximate Model Counting · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023
Systems and software security › information flow control
quantitative information flow
0.712023
Obtaining Information Leakage Bounds via Approximate Model Counting · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.712023
Obtaining Information Leakage Bounds via Approximate Model Counting · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking
model counting
0.212023
Obtaining Information Leakage Bounds via Approximate Model Counting · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 2.0approximate model counting · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Obtaining Information Leakage Bounds via Approximate Model Counting
abstract
Information leaks are a significant problem in modern software systems. In recent years, information theoretic concepts, such as Shannon entropy, have been applied to quantifying information leaks in programs. One recent approach is to use symbolic execution together with model counting constraints solvers in order to quantify information leakage. There are at least two reasons for unsoundness in quantifying information leakage using this approach: 1) Symbolic execution may not be able to explore all execution paths, 2) Model counting constraints solvers may not be able to provide an exact count. We present a sound symbolic quantitative information flow analysis that bounds the information leakage both for the cases where the program behavior is not fully explored and the model counting constraint solver is unable to provide a precise model count but provides an upper and a lower bound. We implemented our approach as an extension to KLEE for computing sound bounds for information leakage in C programs.
Seemanta Saha, Surendra Ghentiyala, Shihua Lu, Lucas Bang, Tevfik Bultan
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.3