Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlo Pagano

dblp:203/2801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 91% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes
1.012026
Strongly Polynomial Time Complexity of Policy Iteration for L∞ Robust MDPs · COLT 2026
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making › markov decision processes
policy iteration
1.012026
Strongly Polynomial Time Complexity of Policy Iteration for L∞ Robust MDPs · COLT 2026
Mathematical optimization › linear programming
strongly polynomial algorithms
1.012026
Strongly Polynomial Time Complexity of Policy Iteration for L∞ Robust MDPs · COLT 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
stochastic games
0.312026
Strongly Polynomial Time Complexity of Policy Iteration for L∞ Robust MDPs · COLT 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy iteration · 1.0linear programming · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Strongly Polynomial Time Complexity of Policy Iteration for L∞ Robust MDPs
abstract
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a fundamental model in sequential decision making. Robust MDPs (RMDPs) extend this framework by allowing uncertainty in transition probabilities and optimizing against the worst-case realization of that uncertainty. In particular, $(s, a)$-rectangular RMDPs with $L_\infty$ uncertainty sets form a fundamental and expressive model: they subsume classical MDPs and turn-based stochastic games. We consider this model with discounted payoffs. The existence of polynomial and strongly-polynomial time algorithms is a fundamental problem for these optimization models. For MDPs, linear programming yields polynomial-time algorithms for any arbitrary discount factor, and the seminal work of Ye established strongly-polynomial time for a fixed discount factor. The generalization of such results to RMDPs has remained an important open problem. In this work, we show that a robust policy iteration algorithm runs in strongly-polynomial time for $(s, a)$-rectangular $L_\infty$ RMDPs with a constant (fixed) discount factor, resolving an important algorithmic question.
Ali Asadi, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Ehsan Kafshdar Goharshady, Mehrdad Karrabi, Alipasha Montaseri, Carlo Pagano
COLT6
2017 Calculating the Power Residue Symbol and Ibeta: Applications of Computing the Group Structure of the Principal Units of a p-adic Number Field Completion
abstract
In the recent PhD thesis of Bouw, an algorithm is examined that computes the group structure of the principal units of a p-adic number field completion. In the same thesis, this algorithm is used to compute Hilbert norm residue symbols. In the present paper, we will demonstrate two other applications.
Koen de Boer, Carlo Pagano
ISSAC2