EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edo Cohen
dblp:203/2824
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Brief Announcement: Object Oriented Consensus · PODC 2017 |
Distributed computing theory › shared memory
shared-memory synchronization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Brief Announcement: Object Oriented Consensus · PODC 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
object-oriented decomposition · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Brief Announcement: Object Oriented ConsensusabstractWe suggest a template that reveals the structure of many consensus algorithms as a generic procedure. The template builds on a new object, vacillate-adopt-commit which is an extension of the well known adopt-commit object. In addition we extend Aspnes's conciliator object to a new object that we call a reconciliator. The consensus algorithm template works in rounds of alternating vacillate-adopt-commit and reconciliator operations. The vacillate-adopt-commit object observes the processors' preferences and suggests a preference output with a measure of confidence vacillate, adopt or commit) on the preference. The reconciliator ensures termination, by providing new preferences for the processors. We show how several key consensus algorithms exactly fit our template. Here we demonstrate the decomposition of Ben-Or's randomized algorithm. The decomposition of the Phase King Byzantine and the Paxos algorithm are given in the full paper [1]. We analyze and compare our template based on vacillate-adopt-commit and reconciliator objects to previous work [3,5], suggesting a decomposition of consensus based on adopt-commit and conciliator objects. We claim that the three return values of vacillate-adopt-commit more accurately describe existing algorithms. Yehuda Afek, James Aspnes, Edo Cohen, Danny Vainstein |
PODC | 3 |