Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Namita Anil Kumar

dblp:203/3018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-0448-671XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
impedance control
0.922021
Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis on Sloped Terrain using Continuous and Nonlinear Impedance Parameters · ICRA 2021
Impedance Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis using Continuously Varying Ankle Impedances and Multiple Equilibria · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.922021
Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis on Sloped Terrain using Continuous and Nonlinear Impedance Parameters · ICRA 2021
Impedance Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis using Continuously Varying Ankle Impedances and Multiple Equilibria · ICRA 2020
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.322021
Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis on Sloped Terrain using Continuous and Nonlinear Impedance Parameters · ICRA 2021
Impedance Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis using Continuously Varying Ankle Impedances and Multiple Equilibria · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

principal component analysis · 1.0optimization · 1.0perturbation studies · 0.9least-squares optimization · 0.4least squares optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis on Sloped Terrain using Continuous and Nonlinear Impedance Parameters
abstract
The design of impedance controllers for sloped walking with a transfemoral prosthesis is a complex control problem that generally results in numerous tuning parameters. This study proposes an easy-to-tune sloped walking control scheme. While the ankle is controlled using impedance control, the knee is controlled using a hybrid strategy of impedance control and trajectory tracking. This study derived continuous, nonlinear impedance functions for the ankle and knee joints using optimization. Principal component analysis of the impedance functions revealed trends that can be used to design impedance controllers for any given slope angle. Said trends were further used to establish a tuning regime which was subsequently tested on a transfemoral prosthesis in an emulator study. The generated gait kinematics and kinetics were found to follow the trends of healthy sloped walking data.
Namita Anil Kumar, Woolim Hong, Pilwon Hur
ICRA1
2020 Impedance Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis using Continuously Varying Ankle Impedances and Multiple Equilibria
abstract
Impedance controllers are popularly used in the field of lower limb prostheses and exoskeleton development. Such controllers assume the joint to be a spring-damper system described by a discrete set of equilibria and impedance parameters. These parameters are estimated via a least squares optimization that minimizes the difference between the controller's output torque and human joint torque. Other researchers have used perturbation studies to determine empirical values for ankle impedance. The resulting values vary greatly from the prior least squares estimates. While perturbation studies are more credible, they require immense investment. This paper extended the least squares approach to reproduce the results of perturbation studies. The resulting ankle impedance parameters were successfully tested on a powered transfemoral prosthesis, AMPRO II. Further, the paper investigated the effect of multiple equilibria on the least squares estimation and the performance of the impedance controller. Finally, the paper uses the proposed least squares optimization method to estimate knee impedance.
Namita Anil Kumar, Woolim Hong, Pilwon Hur
ICRA1