EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vincent Pacelli
dblp:203/3311
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3757-7538ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 32% Motion planning and robot control · 32% Generative modeling · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Robust Control Under Uncertainty via Bounded Rationality and Differential Privacy · ICRA 2022 Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information Bottlenecks · ICRA 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feedback Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
entropic optimal transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feedback Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feedback Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion bridge
schrödinger bridge matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feedback Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
quadratic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › robust control
robust control under uncertainty |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust Control Under Uncertainty via Bounded Rationality and Differential Privacy · ICRA 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust Control Under Uncertainty via Bounded Rationality and Differential Privacy · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
information bottleneck |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information Bottlenecks · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information Bottlenecks · ICRA 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
task-aware representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information Bottlenecks · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
task-based control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information Bottlenecks · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Integration of Local Geometry and Metric Information in Sampling-Based Motion Planning · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
sampling-based motion planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Integration of Local Geometry and Metric Information in Sampling-Based Motion Planning · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
operator splitting · 1.7deep learning · 1.7consensus optimization · 1.7PAC-Bayes theory · 1.7differential privacy · 1.1bounded rationality · 1.1semi-supervised learning · 0.9schrödinger bridge · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9information bottleneck · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic ProgrammingabstractQuadratic programming (QP) forms a crucial foundation in optimization, appearing in a broad spectrum of domains and serving as the basis for more advanced algorithms. Consequently, as the scale and complexity of modern applications continue to grow, the development of efficient and reliable QP algorithms becomes increasingly vital. In this context, this paper introduces a novel deep learning-aided distributed optimization architecture designed for tackling large-scale QP problems. First, we combine the state-of-the-art Operator Splitting QP (OSQP) method with a consensus approach to derive **DistributedQP**, a new method tailored for network-structured problems, with convergence guarantees to optimality. Subsequently, we unfold this optimizer into a deep learning framework, leading to **DeepDistributedQP**, which leverages learned policies to accelerate reaching to desired accuracy within a restricted amount of iterations. Our approach is also theoretically grounded through Probably Approximately Correct (PAC)-Bayes theory, providing generalization bounds on the expected optimality gap for unseen problems. The proposed framework, as well as its centralized version **DeepQP**, significantly outperform their standard optimization counterparts on a variety of tasks such as randomly generated problems, optimal control, linear regression, transportation networks and others. Notably, DeepDistributedQP demonstrates strong generalization by training on small problems and scaling to solve much larger ones (up to 50K variables and 150K constraints) using the same policy. Moreover, it achieves orders-of-magnitude improvements in wall-clock time compared to OSQP. The certifiable performance guarantees of our approach are also demonstrated, ensuring higher-quality solutions over traditional optimizers. Augustinos D. Saravanos, Hunter Kuperman, Alex Oshin, Arshiya Taj Abdul, Vincent Pacelli, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2025 | Feedback Schrödinger Bridge MatchingabstractRecent advancements in diffusion bridges for distribution transport problems have heavily relied on matching frameworks, yet existing methods often face a trade-off between scalability and access to optimal pairings during training.
Fully unsupervised methods make minimal assumptions but incur high computational costs, limiting their practicality. On the other hand, imposing full supervision of the matching process with optimal pairings improves scalability, however, it can be infeasible in most applications.
To strike a balance between scalability and minimal supervision, we introduce Feedback Schrödinger Bridge Matching (FSBM), a novel semi-supervised matching framework that incorporates a small portion ($<8$% of the entire dataset) of pre-aligned pairs as state feedback to guide the transport map of non-coupled samples, thereby significantly improving efficiency. This is achieved by formulating a static Entropic Optimal Transport (EOT) problem with an additional term capturing the semi-supervised guidance. The generalized EOT objective is then recast into a dynamic formulation to leverage the scalability of matching frameworks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FSBM accelerates training and enhances generalization by leveraging coupled pairs' guidance, opening new avenues for training matching frameworks with partially aligned datasets. Panagiotis Theodoropoulos, Nikolaos Komianos, Vincent Pacelli, Guan-Horng Liu, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Robust Control Under Uncertainty via Bounded Rationality and Differential PrivacyabstractThe rapid development of affordable and compact high-fidelity sensors (e.g., cameras and LIDAR) allows robots to construct detailed estimates of their states and environments. However, the availability of such rich sensor information introduces two challenges: (i) the lack of analytic sensing models, which makes it difficult to design controllers that are robust to sensor failures, and (ii) the computational expense of processing the high-dimensional sensor information in real time. This paper addresses these challenges using the theory of differential privacy, which allows us to (i) design controllers with bounded sensitivity to errors in state estimates, and (ii) bound the amount of state information used for control (i.e., to impose decision-making under bounded rationality). The resulting framework approximates the separation principle and allows us to derive an upper-bound on the cost incurred with a faulty state estimator in terms of three quantities: the cost incurred using a perfect state estimator, the magnitude of state estimation errors, and the level of differential privacy. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework numerically on different robotics problems, including nonlinear system stabilization and motion planning. Vincent Pacelli, Anirudha Majumdar |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Task-Driven Estimation and Control via Information BottlenecksabstractOur goal is to develop a principled and general algorithmic framework for task-driven estimation and control for robotic systems. State-of-the-art approaches for controlling robotic systems typically rely heavily on accurately estimating the full state of the robot (e.g., a running robot might estimate joint angles and velocities, torso state, and position relative to a goal). However, full state representations are often excessively rich for the specific task at hand and can lead to significant computational inefficiency and brittleness to errors in state estimation. In contrast, we present an approach that eschews such rich representations and seeks to create task-driven representations. The key technical insight is to leverage the theory of information bottlenecks to formalize the notion of a “task-driven representation” in terms of information theoretic quantities that measure the minimality of a representation. We propose novel iterative algorithms for automatically synthesizing (offline) a task-driven representation (given in terms of a set of task-relevant variables (TRVs)) and a performant control policy that is a function of the TRVs. We present online algorithms for estimating the TRVs in order to apply the control policy. We demonstrate that our approach results in significant robustness to unmodeled measurement uncertainty both theoretically and via thorough simulation experiments including a spring-loaded inverted pendulum running to a goal location. Vincent Pacelli, Anirudha Majumdar |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2018 | Integration of Local Geometry and Metric Information in Sampling-Based Motion PlanningabstractThe efficiency of sampling-based motion planning algorithms is dependent on how well a steering procedure is capable of capturing both system dynamics and configuration space geometry to connect sample configurations. This paper considers how metrics describing local system dynamics may be combined with convex subsets of the free space to describe the local behavior of a steering function for sampling-based planners. Subsequently, a framework for using these subsets to extend the steering procedure to incorporate this information is introduced. To demonstrate our framework, three specific metrics are considered: the LQR cost-to-go function, a Gram matrix derived from system linearization, and the Mahalanobis distance of a linear-Gaussian system. Finally, numerical tests are conducted for a second-order linear system, a kinematic unicycle, and a linear-Gaussian system to demonstrate that our framework increases the connectivity of sampling-based planners and allows them to better explore the free space. Vincent Pacelli, Ömür Arslan, Daniel E. Koditschek |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2017 | Sensory steering for sampling-based motion planningabstractSampling-based algorithms offer computationally efficient, practical solutions to the path finding problem in high-dimensional complex configuration spaces by approximately capturing the connectivity of the underlying space through a (dense) collection of sample configurations joined by simple local planners. In this paper, we address a long-standing bottleneck associated with the difficulty of finding paths through narrow passages. Whereas most prior work considers the narrow passage problem as a sampling issue (and the literature abounds with heuristic sampling strategies) very little attention has been paid to the design of new effective local planners. Here, we propose a novel sensory steering algorithm for sampling-based motion planning that can “feel” a configuration space locally and significantly improve the path planning performance near difficult regions such as narrow passages. We provide computational evidence for the effectiveness of the proposed local planner through a variety of simulations which suggest that our proposed sensory steering algorithm outperforms the standard straight-line planner by significantly increasing the connectivity of random motion planning graphs. Ömür Arslan, Vincent Pacelli, Daniel E. Koditschek |
IROS | 2 |