Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siddharth Baskar

dblp:203/3773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion
0.912025
Deep-Union Completion · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
subspace clustering
0.912025
Deep-Union Completion · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › subspace learning
union of subspaces
0.912025
Deep-Union Completion · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pseudo-completion layer · 0.9low-rank matrix completion · 0.9clustering layer · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Deep-Union Completion
abstract
Large amounts of missing data are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in modern high-dimensional datasets. Unfortunately, classical completion methods like low-rank, high-rank, or deep matrix completion (LRMC/HRMC/DMC) are often unable to handle real data that does not fall under their respective models. Here we propose a novel completion strategy that generalizes all these models. The main idea is to find a Union of Subspaces (UoS) that can fit a non-linear embedding of the original data, and complete the data according to this latent UoS. This embedding is obtained through a novel pseudo-completion layer in a deep architecture, and the UoS structure is identified in closed-form through an intermediate clustering layer. Our design reduces the exponential memory requirements that are typically induced by uneven patterns of missing data. We give exact details of our architecture, model, loss functions, and training strategy. Our experiments on over 10 real datasets show that our method consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art accuracy by more than a staggering 40%.
Siddharth Baskar, Karan Vikyath Veeranna Rupashree, Daniel L. Pimentel-Alarcón
AAAI1
2025 Latent Union Completion
abstract
Large amounts of missing data are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in modern high-dimensional datasets. Highrank matrix completion (HRMC) uses the powerful union of subspace (UoS) model to handle these vast amounts of missing data. However, existing HRMC methods often fail when dealing with real data that does not follow the UoS model exactly. Here we propose a new approach: instead of finding a UoS that fits the observed data directly, we will find a UoS in a latent space that can fit a non-linear embedding of the original data. Embeddings of this kind are typically attained with deep architectures. However, the abundance of missing data impedes the training process, as the coordinates of the observed samples rarely overlap. We overcome this difficulty with a novel pseudo-completion layer (in charge of estimating the missing values) followed by an autoencoder (in charge of finding the embedding) coupled with a self-expressive layer (that clusters data according to a UoS in the latent space). Our design reduces the exponential memory requirements that are typically induced by uneven patterns of missing data. We give exact details of our architecture, model, loss functions, and training strategy. Our experiments on several real datasets show that our method consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art accuracy by more than a staggering 40%.
Karan Vikyath Veeranna Rupashree, Siddharth Baskar, Daniel L. Pimentel-Alarcón
ISIT2