Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Requeima
dblp:203/4456
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 48% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Language models and text generation · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
2.9 | 5 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes · ICLR 2023 Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.1 | 3 | 2025 | Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2020 Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification using Conditional Neural Adaptive Processes · NeurIPS 2019 Estimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
shift equivariance |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
bayesian causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Meta-Learning Approach to Bayesian Causal Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Meta-Learning Approach to Bayesian Causal Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › large language model for time series
LLM-based forecasting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
time series foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
probabilistic regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
transformer neural processes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
conditional neural process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.5 | 2 | 2024 | Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical Space · ICML 2017 LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
maximum likelihood learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification using Conditional Neural Adaptive Processes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
multi-task classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification using Conditional Neural Adaptive Processes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical Space · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical Space · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Estimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning and data management
multimodal learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Convolutional Conditional Neural Processes · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification using Conditional Neural Adaptive Processes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
chemical space exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical Space · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical forecasting · 1.7LLM prompting · 1.7meta-learning · 1.7conditional neural process · 1.0transformer neural process · 0.9bayesian model averaging · 0.9bayesian inference · 0.9transformer · 0.8permutation invariant set functions · 0.8large language model · 0.8parallel and distributed thompson sampling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Meta-Learning Approach to Bayesian Causal DiscoveryabstractDiscovering a unique causal structure is difficult due to both inherent identifiability issues, and the consequences of finite data.
As such, uncertainty over causal structures, such as those obtained from a Bayesian posterior, are often necessary for downstream tasks.
Finding an accurate approximation to this posterior is challenging, due to the large number of possible causal graphs, as well as the difficulty in the subproblem of finding posteriors over the functional relationships of the causal edges.
Recent works have used Bayesian meta learning to view the problem of posterior estimation as a supervised learning task.
Yet, these methods are limited as they cannot reliably sample from the posterior over causal structures and fail to encode key properties of the posterior, such as correlation between edges and permutation equivariance with respect to nodes.
To address these limitations, we propose a Bayesian meta learning model that allows for sampling causal structures from the posterior and encodes these key properties.
We compare our meta-Bayesian causal discovery against existing Bayesian causal discovery methods, demonstrating the advantages of directly learning a posterior over causal structure. Anish Dhir, Matthew Ashman, James Requeima, Mark van der Wilk |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual InformationabstractForecasting is a critical task in decision-making across numerous domains. While historical numerical data provide a start, they fail to convey the complete context for reliable and accurate predictions. Human forecasters frequently rely on additional information, such as background knowledge and constraints, which can efficiently be communicated through natural language. However, in spite of recent progress with LLM-based forecasters, their ability to effectively integrate this textual information remains an open question. To address this, we introduce "Context is Key" (CiK), a time-series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context, requiring models to integrate both modalities; crucially, every task in CiK requires understanding textual context to be solved successfully. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters, and propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings. This benchmark aims to advance multimodal forecasting by promoting models that are both accurate and accessible to decision-makers with varied technical expertise. The benchmark can be visualized at https://servicenow.github.io/context-is-key-forecasting/v0. Andrew Robert Williams, Arjun Ashok, Étienne Marcotte, Valentina Zantedeschi, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Roland Riachi, James Requeima, Alexandre Lacoste, Irina Rish, Nicolas Chapados, Alexandre Drouin |
ICML | 7 |
| 2025 | Estimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-LearningabstractIn scientific domains---from biology to the social sciences---many questions boil down to \textit{What effect will we observe if we intervene on a particular variable?} If the causal relationships (e.g.~a causal graph) are known, its possible to estimate the intervention distributions. In the absence of this domain knowledge, the causal structure must be discovered from the available observational data. However, observational data are often compatible with multiple causal graphs, making methods that commit to a single structure prone to overconfidence. A principled way to manage this structural uncertainty is via Bayesian inference, which averages over a posterior distribution on possible causal structures and functional mechanisms. Unfortunately, the number of causal structures grows super-exponentially with the number of nodes in the graph, making computations intractable. We propose to circumvent these challenges by using meta-learning to create an end-to-end model: the Model-Averaged Causal Estimation Transformer Neural Process (MACE-TNP). The model is trained to predict the Bayesian model-averaged interventional posterior distribution, and its end-to-end nature bypasses the need for expensive calculations. Empirically, we demonstrate that MACE-TNP outperforms strong Bayesian baselines. Our work established meta-learning as a flexible and scalable paradigm for approximating complex Bayesian causal inference, that can be scaled to increasingly challenging settings in the future. Anish Dhir, Cristiana Diaconu, Valentinian Lungu, James Requeima, Richard E. Turner, Mark van der Wilk |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural ProcessesabstractThe effectiveness of neural processes (NPs) in modelling posterior prediction maps—the mapping from data to posterior predictive distributions—has significantly improved since their inception. This improvement can be attributed to two principal factors: (1) advancements in the architecture of permutation invariant set functions, which are intrinsic to all NPs; and (2) leveraging symmetries present in the true posterior predictive map, which are problem dependent. Transformers are a notable development in permutation invariant set functions, and their utility within NPs has been demonstrated through the family of models we refer to as TNPs. Despite significant interest in TNPs, little attention has been given to incorporating symmetries. Notably, the posterior prediction maps for data that are stationary—a common assumption in spatio-temporal modelling—exhibit translation equivariance. In this paper, we introduce of a new family of translation equivariant TNPs that incorporate translation equivariance. Through an extensive range of experiments on synthetic and real-world spatio-temporal data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of TE-TNPs relative to their non-translation-equivariant counterparts and other NP baselines. Matthew Ashman, Cristiana Diaconu, Junhyuck Kim, Lakee Sivaraya, Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural LanguageabstractMachine learning practitioners often face significant challenges in formally integrating their prior knowledge and beliefs into predictive models, limiting the potential for nuanced and context-aware analyses. Moreover, the expertise needed to integrate this prior knowledge into probabilistic modeling typically limits the application of these models to specialists. Our goal is to build a regression model that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions at arbitrary locations, guided by natural language text which describes a user's prior knowledge. Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a useful starting point for designing such a tool since they 1) provide an interface where users can incorporate expert insights in natural language and 2) provide an opportunity for leveraging latent problem-relevant knowledge encoded in LLMs that users may not have themselves. We start by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from LLMs. We examine these joint predictive distributions, which we call LLM Processes, over arbitrarily-many quantities in settings such as forecasting, multi-dimensional regression, black-box optimization, and image modeling. We investigate the practical details of prompting to elicit coherent predictive distributions, and demonstrate their effectiveness at regression. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to usefully incorporate text into numerical predictions, improving predictive performance and giving quantitative structure that reflects qualitative descriptions. This lets us begin to explore the rich, grounded hypothesis space that LLMs implicitly encode. James Requeima, John Bronskill, Dami Choi, Richard E. Turner, David Duvenaud |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes
Wessel P. Bruinsma, Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Andrew Y. K. Foong, Tom R. Andersson, Anna Vaughan, Anthony Buonomo, J. Scott Hosking, Richard E. Turner |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions
Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Anna Vaughan, Richard E. Turner |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Convolutional Conditional Neural Processes
Jonathan Gordon 0003, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Andrew Y. K. Foong, James Requeima, Yann Dubois, Richard E. Turner |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | TaskNorm: Rethinking Batch Normalization for Meta-LearningabstractModern meta-learning approaches for image classification rely on increasingly deep networks to achieve state-of-the-art performance, making batch normalization an essential component of meta-learning pipelines. However, the hierarchical nature of the meta-learning setting presents several challenges that can render conventional batch normalization ineffective, giving rise to the need to rethink normalization in this setting. We evaluate a range of approaches to batch normalization for meta-learning scenarios, and develop a novel approach that we call TaskNorm. Experiments on fourteen datasets demonstrate that the choice of batch normalization has a dramatic effect on both classification accuracy and training time for both gradient based- and gradient-free meta-learning approaches. Importantly, TaskNorm is found to consistently improve performance. Finally, we provide a set of best practices for normalization that will allow fair comparison of meta-learning algorithms. John Bronskill, Jonathan Gordon 0003, James Requeima, Sebastian Nowozin, Richard E. Turner |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural ProcessesabstractStationary stochastic processes (SPs) are a key component of many probabilistic models, such as those for off-the-grid spatio-temporal data. They enable the statistical symmetry of underlying physical phenomena to be leveraged, thereby aiding generalization. Prediction in such models can be viewed as a translation equivariant map from observed data sets to predictive SPs, emphasizing the intimate relationship between stationarity and equivariance. Building on this, we propose the Convolutional Neural Process (ConvNP), which endows Neural Processes (NPs) with translation equivariance and extends convolutional conditional NPs to allow for dependencies in the predictive distribution. The latter enables ConvNPs to be deployed in settings which require coherent samples, such as Thompson sampling or conditional image completion. Moreover, we propose a new maximum-likelihood objective to replace the standard ELBO objective in NPs, which conceptually simplifies the framework and empirically improves performance. We demonstrate the strong performance and generalization capabilities of ConvNPs on 1D regression, image completion, and various tasks with real-world spatio-temporal data. Andrew Y. K. Foong, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Jonathan Gordon 0003, Yann Dubois, James Requeima, Richard E. Turner |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2019 | The Gaussian Process Autoregressive Regression Model (GPAR)abstractMulti-output regression models must exploit dependencies between outputs to maximise predictive performance. The application of Gaussian processes (GPs) to this setting typically yields models that are computationally demanding and have limited representational power. We present the Gaussian Process Autoregressive Regression (GPAR) model, a scalable multi-output GP model that is able to capture nonlinear, possibly input-varying, dependencies between outputs in a simple and tractable way: the product rule is used to decompose the joint distribution over the outputs into a set of conditionals, each of which is modelled by a standard GP. GPAR’s efficacy is demonstrated on a variety of synthetic and real-world problems, outperforming existing GP models and achieving state-of-the-art performance on established benchmarks. James Requeima, William Tebbutt, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | Fast and Flexible Multi-Task Classification using Conditional Neural Adaptive ProcessesabstractThe goal of this paper is to design image classification systems that, after an initial multi-task training phase, can automatically adapt to new tasks encountered at test time. We introduce a conditional neural process based approach to the multi-task classification setting for this purpose, and establish connections to the meta- and few-shot learning literature. The resulting approach, called CNAPs, comprises a classifier whose parameters are modulated by an adaptation network that takes the current task's dataset as input. We demonstrate that CNAPs achieves state-of-the-art results on the challenging Meta-Dataset benchmark indicating high-quality transfer-learning. We show that the approach is robust, avoiding both over-fitting in low-shot regimes and under-fitting in high-shot regimes. Timing experiments reveal that CNAPs is computationally efficient at test-time as it does not involve gradient based adaptation. Finally, we show that trained models are immediately deployable to continual learning and active learning where they can outperform existing approaches that do not leverage transfer learning. James Requeima, Jonathan Gordon 0003, John Bronskill, Sebastian Nowozin, Richard E. Turner |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical SpaceabstractChemical space is so large that brute force searches for new interesting molecules are infeasible. High-throughput virtual screening via computer cluster simulations can speed up the discovery process by collecting very large amounts of data in parallel, e.g., up to hundreds or thousands of parallel measurements. Bayesian optimization (BO) can produce additional acceleration by sequentially identifying the most useful simulations or experiments to be performed next. However, current BO methods cannot scale to the large numbers of parallel measurements and the massive libraries of molecules currently used in high-throughput screening. Here, we propose a scalable solution based on a parallel and distributed implementation of Thompson sampling (PDTS). We show that, in small scale problems, PDTS performs similarly as parallel expected improvement (EI), a batch version of the most widely used BO heuristic. Additionally, in settings where parallel EI does not scale, PDTS outperforms other scalable baselines such as a greedy search, $\epsilon$-greedy approaches and a random search method. These results show that PDTS is a successful solution for large-scale parallel BO. José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, James Requeima, Edward Pyzer-Knapp, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
ICML | 2 |