Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hippolyt Ritter
dblp:203/4484
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Learning paradigms · 17% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Black-box coreset variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 Sparse Uncertainty Representation in Deep Learning with Inducing Weights · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting in Few-Shot Problems · ICML 2021 Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Sparse Uncertainty Representation in Deep Learning with Inducing Weights · NeurIPS 2021 A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › recursive bayesian estimation
bayesian online learning |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting in Few-Shot Problems · ICML 2021 Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Black-box coreset variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting in Few-Shot Problems · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting in Few-Shot Problems · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Sparse Uncertainty Representation in Deep Learning with Inducing Weights · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
laplace approximation · 1.2coreset methods · 0.6black-box variational inference · 0.6variational inference · 0.5matheron's rule · 0.5inducing weights · 0.5gaussian sampling · 0.5MAML · 0.5kronecker-factored approximation · 0.3gaussian posterior · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Training Set Cleansing of Backdoor Poisoning by Self-Supervised Representation LearningabstractA backdoor or Trojan attack is an important type of data poisoning attack against deep neural network (DNN) classifiers, wherein the training dataset is poisoned with a small number of samples that each possess the backdoor pattern (usually a pattern that is either imperceptible or innocuous) and which are mislabeled to the attacker’s target class. When trained on a backdoor-poisoned dataset, a DNN behaves normally on most benign test samples but makes incorrect predictions to the target class when the test sample has the backdoor pattern incorporated (i.e., contains a backdoor trigger). Here we focus on image classification tasks and show that supervised training may build stronger association between the backdoor pattern and the associated target class than that between normal features and the true class of origin. By contrast, self-supervised representation learning ignores the labels of samples and learns a feature embedding based on images’ semantic content. Using a feature embedding found by self-supervised representation learning, a data cleansing method, which combines sample filtering and relabeling, is developed. Experiments on CIFAR-10 benchmark datasets show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in mitigating backdoor attacks. Sahar Karami, Ousmane Dia, Hippolyt Ritter, Ehsan Emamjomeh-Zadeh, Zhen Xiang, David J. Miller 0001, George Kesidis |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2022 | Black-box coreset variational inferenceabstractRecent advances in coreset methods have shown that a selection of representative datapoints can replace massive volumes of data for Bayesian inference, preserving the relevant statistical information and significantly accelerating subsequent downstream tasks. Existing variational coreset constructions rely on either selecting subsets of the observed datapoints, or jointly performing approximate inference and optimizing pseudodata in the observed space akin to inducing points methods in Gaussian Processes. So far, both approaches are limited by complexities in evaluating their objectives for general purpose models, and require generating samples from a typically intractable posterior over the coreset throughout inference and testing. In this work, we present a black-box variational inference framework for coresets that overcomes these constraints and enables principled application of variational coresets to intractable models, such as Bayesian neural networks. We apply our techniques to supervised learning problems, and compare them with existing approaches in the literature for data summarization and inference. Dionysis Manousakas, Hippolyt Ritter, Theofanis Karaletsos |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting in Few-Shot ProblemsabstractNeural networks are known to suffer from catastrophic forgetting when trained on sequential datasets. While there have been numerous attempts to solve this problem in large-scale supervised classification, little has been done to overcome catastrophic forgetting in few-shot classification problems. We demonstrate that the popular gradient-based model-agnostic meta-learning algorithm (MAML) indeed suffers from catastrophic forgetting and introduce a Bayesian online meta-learning framework that tackles this problem. Our framework utilises Bayesian online learning and meta-learning along with Laplace approximation and variational inference to overcome catastrophic forgetting in few-shot classification problems. The experimental evaluations demonstrate that our framework can effectively achieve this goal in comparison with various baselines. As an additional utility, we also demonstrate empirically that our framework is capable of meta-learning on sequentially arriving few-shot tasks from a stationary task distribution. Pau Ching Yap, Hippolyt Ritter, David Barber |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Sparse Uncertainty Representation in Deep Learning with Inducing WeightsabstractBayesian Neural Networks and deep ensembles represent two modern paradigms of uncertainty quantification in deep learning. Yet these approaches struggle to scale mainly due to memory inefficiency, requiring parameter storage several times that of their deterministic counterparts. To address this, we augment each weight matrix with a small inducing weight matrix, projecting the uncertainty quantification into a lower dimensional space. We further extend Matheron’s conditional Gaussian sampling rule to enable fast weight sampling, which enables our inference method to maintain reasonable run-time as compared with ensembles. Importantly, our approach achieves competitive performance to the state-of-the-art in prediction and uncertainty estimation tasks with fully connected neural networks and ResNets, while reducing the parameter size to $\leq 24.3\%$ of that of a single neural network. Hippolyt Ritter, Martin Kukla, Cheng Zhang 0005, Yingzhen Li |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks
Hippolyt Ritter, Aleksandar Botev, David Barber |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic ForgettingabstractWe introduce the Kronecker factored online Laplace approximation for overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. The method is grounded in a Bayesian online learning framework, where we recursively approximate the posterior after every task with a Gaussian, leading to a quadratic penalty on changes to the weights. The Laplace approximation requires calculating the Hessian around a mode, which is typically intractable for modern architectures. In order to make our method scalable, we leverage recent block-diagonal Kronecker factored approximations to the curvature. Our algorithm achieves over 90% test accuracy across a sequence of 50 instantiations of the permuted MNIST dataset, substantially outperforming related methods for overcoming catastrophic forgetting. Hippolyt Ritter, Aleksandar Botev, David Barber |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep LearningabstractWe present an efficient block-diagonal approximation to the Gauss-Newton matrix for feedforward neural networks. Our resulting algorithm is competitive against state-of-the-art first-order optimisation methods, with sometimes significant improvement in optimisation performance. Unlike first-order methods, for which hyperparameter tuning of the optimisation parameters is often a laborious process, our approach can provide good performance even when used with default settings. A side result of our work is that for piecewise linear transfer functions, the network objective function can have no differentiable local maxima, which may partially explain why such transfer functions facilitate effective optimisation. Aleksandar Botev, Hippolyt Ritter, David Barber |
ICML | 2 |