Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp S. Schmitt
dblp:203/4924 · also Philipp Sebastian Schmitt
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Robot navigation and mapping · 11% Robot manipulation · 6% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
manipulation planning |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Modeling and Planning Manipulation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2019 Optimal, sampling-based manipulation planning · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
constraint-based control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling and Planning Manipulation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
kinodynamic planning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling and Planning Manipulation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling and Planning Manipulation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Configuration of Perception Systems via Planning Over Factor Graphs · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › optimal motion planning
asymptotically optimal motion planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimal, sampling-based manipulation planning · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
sampling-based motion planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimal, sampling-based manipulation planning · ICRA 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
factor graphs |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Configuration of Perception Systems via Planning Over Factor Graphs · ICRA 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Configuration of Perception Systems via Planning Over Factor Graphs · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online collision avoidance · 0.4constraint-based controller synthesis · 0.4semantic goal description · 0.3planning algorithm · 0.3factor graph construction · 0.3probabilistic roadmap · 0.3asymptotic optimality proof · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Constraint-based Task Specification and Trajectory Optimization for Sequential ManipulationabstractTo economically deploy robotic manipulators the programming and execution of robot motions must be swift. To this end, we propose a novel, constraint-based method to intuitively specify sequential manipulation tasks and to compute time-optimal robot motions for such a task specification. Our approach follows the ideas of constraint-based task specification by aiming for a minimal and object-centric task description that is largely independent of the underlying robot kinematics. We transform this task description into a non-linear optimization problem. By solving this problem we obtain a (locally) time-optimal robot motion, not just for a single motion, but for an entire manipulation sequence. We demonstrate the capabilities of our approach in a series of experiments involving five distinct robot models, including a highly redundant mobile manipulator. Mun Seng Phoon, Philipp S. Schmitt, Georg von Wichert |
IROS | 2 |
| 2019 | Modeling and Planning Manipulation in Dynamic EnvironmentsabstractIn this paper we propose a new model for sequential manipulation tasks that also considers robot dynamics and time-variant environments. From this model we automatically derive constraint-based controllers and use them as steering functions in a kinodynamic manipulation planner. The resulting plan is not a trajectory but a sequence of controllers that react online to disturbances. We validated our approach in simulation and on a real robot. In the experiments our approach plans and executes dual-robot manipulation tasks with online collision avoidance and reactions to estimates of object poses. Philipp S. Schmitt, Florian Wirnshofer, Kai M. Wurm, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | State Estimation in Contact-Rich ManipulationabstractThis paper introduces a Bayesian state estimator for contact-rich manipulation tasks with application in non-prehensile manipulation, industrial assembly or in-hand localization. The core idea of our approach is to explicitly model both the contact dynamics and a torque-based robot controller as part of the underlying system model. Our approach is capable of estimating the state of movable objects for various robot kinematics and geometries of robots and objects. This includes complex scenarios with multiple robots, multiple objects and articulated objects. We have validated our approach in simulation and on a physical robot. The experiments show that multimodal distributions of six degrees of freedom object poses can be accurately tracked in real-time in a complex manipulation scenario. Florian Wirnshofer, Philipp S. Schmitt, Philine Meister, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2019 | Planning Reactive Manipulation in Dynamic EnvironmentsabstractWhen robots perform manipulation tasks, they need to determine their own movement, as well as how to make and break contact with objects in their environment. Reasoning about the motions of robots and objects simultaneously leads to a constrained planning problem in a high-dimensional state-space. Additionally, when environments change dynamically motions must be computed in real-time. To this end, we propose a feedback planner for manipulation. We model manipulation as constrained motion and use this model to automatically derive a set of constraint-based controllers. These controllers are used in a switching-control scheme, where the active controller is chosen by a reinforcement learning agent. Our approach is capable of addressing tasks with second-order dynamics, closed kinematic chains, and time-variant environments. We validated our approach in simulation and on a real, dual-arm robot. Extensive simulation of three distinct robots and tasks show a significant increase in robustness compared to a previous approach. Philipp S. Schmitt, Florian Wirnshofer, Kai M. Wurm, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
IROS | 1 |
| 2019 | Robust, Compliant Assembly with Elastic Parts and Model UncertaintyabstractIn this paper, we present an approach to generate robot motions for robust parts assembly. The computation of motions for parts assembly usually requires an exact model of all relevant objects. Generating detailed object models, including friction and dynamics, is often complex and time-consuming, especially in the context of elastic parts. In addition, executing motions on real hardware will usually introduce further uncertainty. For this reason, we propose an approach that is inherently robust against model parameter uncertainties and unknown characteristics of elastic parts. Our planner explicitly takes into account the internal states of articulated objects, as well as uncertain model parameters, by constructing a search tree in the belief-parameter-space. It yields successful assembly motions from coarse object models and thus eliminates the need for detailed parameter tuning. We evaluated our approach with respect to four assembly tasks. Extensive simulations show that our planner significantly increases the success-rate compared to previous approaches. Numerous experiments on a real robot confirm the simulated results. Florian Wirnshofer, Philipp S. Schmitt, Philine Meister, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
IROS | 2 |
| 2018 | Configuration of Perception Systems via Planning Over Factor GraphsabstractSensor guided, automated systems require the composition of various sensors and data processing algorithms to obtain relevant information for performing their task. Many applications have additional requirements such as a certain accuracy, which has to be achieved despite sensor noise and calibration errors. In this paper we model the configuration of perception systems as a planning problem over probabilistic graphical models. We work on a subset of the full configuration space of perceptions systems, specifically the used sensors, data processing algorithms and view poses. Based on a semantic description of the goal, available sensors and data processing algorithms, our system plans perception steps and sensor data fusion autonomously. The planner operates by constructing a factor graph until the accuracy requirements of tasks are fulfilled or unobtainable with the available action set. We validate our approach in an industrial assembly scenario. Vincent Dietrich, Bernd Kast, Philipp S. Schmitt, Sebastian Albrecht 0001, Michael Fiegert, Wendelin Feiten, Michael Beetz |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2018 | Robust, Compliant Assembly via Optimal Belief Space PlanningabstractIn automated manufacturing, robots must reliably assemble parts of various geometries and low tolerances. Ideally, they plan the required motions autonomously. This poses a substantial challenge due to high-dimensional state spaces and non-linear contact-dynamics. Furthermore, object poses and model parameters, such as friction, are not exactly known and a source of uncertainty. The method proposed in this paper models the task of parts assembly as a belief space planning problem over an underlying impedance-controlled, compliant system. To solve this planning problem we introduce an asymptotically optimal belief space planner by extending an optimal, randomized, kinodynamic motion planner to nondeterministic domains. Under an expansiveness assumption we establish probabilistic completeness and asymptotic optimality. We validate our approach in thorough, simulated and realworld experiments of multiple assembly tasks. The experiments demonstrate our planner's ability to reliably assemble objects, solely based on CAD models as input. Florian Wirnshofer, Philipp S. Schmitt, Wendelin Feiten, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2017 | Optimal, sampling-based manipulation planningabstractWhen robots perform manipulation tasks, they need to determine their own movement, as well as how to grasp and release an object. Reasoning about the motion of the robot and the object simultaneously leads to a multi-modal planning problem in a high-dimensional configuration space. In this paper we propose an asymptotically optimal manipulation planner. Our approach extends optimal sampling-based roadmap planners to efficiently explore the configuration space of the robot and the object. We prove probabilistic completeness and global, asymptotic optimality. Extensive simulations of a typical pick-and-place scenario show that our approach significantly outperforms a (nonoptimal) state-of-the-art approach. We implemented our planner on a real manipulator and were able to compute high quality solutions in less than a second. Philipp S. Schmitt, Werner Neubauer, Wendelin Feiten, Kai M. Wurm, Georg von Wichert, Wolfram Burgard |
ICRA | 1 |