Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emily Hannigan

dblp:203/5364 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 43% Robot manipulation · 29% Motion planning and robot control · 28%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
gait generation
0.412020
Automatic Snake Gait Generation Using Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.412020
Automatic Snake Gait Generation Using Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot
snake robot
0.412020
Automatic Snake Gait Generation Using Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › contact sensing
contact localization
0.312017
Accurate contact localization and indentation depth prediction with an optics-based tactile sensor · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing
0.312017
Accurate contact localization and indentation depth prediction with an optics-based tactile sensor · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.112020
Automatic Snake Gait Generation Using Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory optimization · 0.4model predictive control · 0.4light intensity measurement · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Automatic Snake Gait Generation Using Model Predictive Control
abstract
In this paper, we propose a method for generating undulatory gaits for snake robots. Instead of starting from a pre-defined movement pattern such as a serpenoid curve, we use a Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach to automatically generate effective locomotion gaits via trajectory optimization. An important advantage of this approach is that the resulting gaits are automatically adapted to the environment that is being modeled as part of the snake dynamics. To illustrate this, we use a novel model for anisotropic dry friction, along with existing models for viscous friction and fluid dynamic effects such as drag and added mass. For each of these models, gaits generated without any change in the method or its parameters are as efficient as Pareto-optimal serpenoid gaits tuned individually for each environment. Furthermore, the proposed method can also produce more complex or irregular gaits, e.g. for obstacle avoidance or executing sharp turns.
Emily Hannigan, Gagan Khandate, Maximilian Haas-Heger, Ji Yin, Matei T. Ciocarlie
ICRA1
2017 Accurate contact localization and indentation depth prediction with an optics-based tactile sensor
abstract
Traditional methods to achieve high localization accuracy with tactile sensors usually use a matrix of miniaturized individual sensors distributed on the area of interest. This approach usually comes at a price of increased complexity in fabrication and circuitry, and can be hard to adapt for non planar geometries. We propose to use low cost optic components mounted on the edges of the sensing area to measure how light traveling through an elastomer is affected by touch. Multiple light emitters and receivers provide us with a rich signal set that contains the necessary information to pinpoint both the location and depth of an indentation with high accuracy. We demonstrate sub-millimeter accuracy on location and depth on a 20mm by 20mm active sensing area. Our sensor provides high depth sensitivity as a result of two different modalities in how light is guided through our elastomer. This method results in a low cost, easy to manufacture sensor. We believe this approach can be adapted to cover non-planar surfaces, simplifying future integration in robot skin applications.
Pedro Piacenza, Weipeng Dang, Emily Hannigan, Jeremy Espinal, Ikram Hussain, Ioannis Kymissis, Matei T. Ciocarlie
ICRA3