FPGA as general-purpose accelerators can greatly improve system efficiency and performance in cloud and edge devices alike. However, they have recently become the focus of remote attacks, such as fault and side-channel attacks from one to another user of a part of the FPGA fabric. In this work, we consider system-on-chip platforms, where an FPGA and an embedded processor core are located on the same die. We show that the embedded processor core is vulnerable to voltage drops generated by the FPGA logic. Our experiments demonstrate the possibility of compromising the data transfer from external DDR memory to the processor cache hierarchy. Furthermore, we were also able to fault and skip instructions executed on an ARM Cortex-A9 core. The FPGA based fault injection is shown precise enough to recover the secret key of an AES T-tables implementation found in the mbedTLS library.

Isolated execution is a concept commonly used for increasing the security of a computer system. In the embedded world, ARM TrustZone technology enables this goal and is currently used on mobile devices for applications such as secure payment or biometric authentication. In this work, we investigate the security benefits achievable through the usage of ARM TrustZone on FPGA-SoCs. We first adapt Microsoft’s implementation of a firmware Trusted Platform Module (fTPM) running inside ARM TrustZone for the Zynq UltraScale+ platform. This adaptation consists in integrating hardware accelerators available on the device to fTPM’s implementation and to enhance fTPM with an entropy source derived from on-chip SRAM start-up patterns. With our approach, we transform a software implementation of a TPM into a hybrid hardware/software design that could address some of the security drawbacks of the original implementation while keeping its flexibility. To demonstrate the security gains obtained via the usage of ARM TrustZone and our hybrid-TPM on FPGA-SoCs, we propose a framework that combines them for enabling a secure remote bitstream loading. The approach consists in preventing the insecure usages of a bitstream reconfiguration interface that are made possible by the manufacturer and to integrate the interface inside a Trusted Execution Environment.

System-on-Chips (SoCs) are a key enabling technology for the Internet-of-Things (IoT), a hyper-connected world where on- and inter-chip communication is ubiquitous. SoCs usually integrate cryptographic hardware cores for confidentiality and authentication services. However, these components are prone to implementation attacks. During the operation of a cryptographic core, the secret key may passively be inferred through cache observations. Access-driven attacks exploiting these observations are therefore a vital threat to SoCs operating in IoT environments. Previous works have shown the feasibility of these attacks in the SoC context. Yet, the SoC communication structure can be used to further improve access-based cache attacks. The communication attacks are not as well-understood as other micro-architectural attacks. It is important to raise the awareness of SoC designers of such a threat. To this end, we present four contributions. First, we demonstrate an improved Prime+Probe attack on four different AES-128 implementations (original transformation tables, T 0 -Only, T 2KB , and S-Box). As a novelty, this attack exploits the collisions of the bus-based SoC communication to further increase its efficiency. Second, we explore the impact of preloading on the efficiency of our communication-optimized attack. Third, we integrate three countermeasures ( shuffling , mini-tables , and Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA) bus arbitration ) and evaluate their impact on the attack. Although shuffling and mini-tables countermeasures were proposed in previous work, their application as countermeasures against the bus-based attack was not studied before. In addition, TDMA as a countermeasure for bus-based attacks is an original contribution of this work. Fourth, we further discuss the implications of our work in the SoC design and its perspective with the new cryptographic primitives proposed in the ongoing National Institute of Standard and Technology Lightweight Cryptography competition. The results show that our improved communication-optimized attack is efficient, speeding up full key recovery by up to 400 times when compared to the traditional Prime+Probe technique. Moreover, the protection techniques are feasible and effectively mitigate the proposed improved attack.