Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

S. Sivaranjani

dblp:203/6880 · also Sivaranjani S. · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Reinforcement learning · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 22%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.912025
Globally Optimal Policy Gradient Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning with PID Control Policies · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.812024
ECLipsE: Efficient Compositional Lipschitz Constant Estimation for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz constant estimation
0.812024
ECLipsE: Efficient Compositional Lipschitz Constant Estimation for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex relaxation
semidefinite programming relaxation
0.812024
ECLipsE: Efficient Compositional Lipschitz Constant Estimation for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.312025
Globally Optimal Policy Gradient Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning with PID Control Policies · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient dominance analysis · 0.9PID control · 0.9semidefinite programming · 0.8matrix verification decomposition · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Globally Optimal Policy Gradient Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning with PID Control Policies
abstract
We develop policy gradient algorithms with global optimality and convergence guarantees for reinforcement learning (RL) with proportional-integral-derivative (PID) parameterized control policies. RL enables learning control policies through direct interaction with a system, without explicit model knowledge that is typically assumed in classical control. The PID policy architecture offers built-in structural advantages, such as superior tracking performance, elimination of steady-state errors, and robustness to model error that have made it a widely adopted paradigm in practice. Despite these advantages, the PID parameterization has received limited attention in the RL literature, and PID control designs continue to rely on heuristic tuning rules without theoretical guarantees. We address this gap by rigorously integrating PID control with RL, offering theoretical guarantees while maintaining the practical advantages that have made PID control ubiquitous in practice. Specifically, we first formulate PID control design as an optimization problem with a control policy that is parameterized by proportional, integral, and derivative components. We derive exact expressions for policy gradients in these parameters, and leverage them to develop both model-based and model-free policy gradient algorithms for PID policies. We then establish gradient dominance properties of the PID policy optimization problem, and provide theoretical guarantees on convergence and global optimality in this setting. Finally, we benchmark the performance of our algorithms on the controlgym suite of environments.
Vipul Sharma, Wesley Suttle, S. Sivaranjani
NeurIPS3
2024 ECLipsE: Efficient Compositional Lipschitz Constant Estimation for Deep Neural Networks
abstract
The Lipschitz constant plays a crucial role in certifying the robustness of neural networks to input perturbations. Since calculating the exact Lipschitz constant is NP-hard, efforts have been made to obtain tight upper bounds on the Lipschitz constant. Typically, this involves solving a large matrix verification problem, the computational cost of which grows significantly for both deeper and wider networks. In this paper, we provide a compositional approach to estimate Lipschitz constants for deep feed-forward neural networks. We first obtain an exact decomposition of the large matrix verification problem into smaller sub-problems. Then, leveraging the underlying cascade structure of the network, we develop two algorithms. The first algorithm explores the geometric features of the problem and enables us to provide Lipschitz estimates that are comparable to existing methods by solving small semidefinite programs (SDPs) that are only as large as the size of each layer. The second algorithm relaxes these sub-problems and provides a closed-form solution to each sub-problem for extremely fast estimation, altogether eliminating the need to solve SDPs. The two algorithms represent different levels of trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach provides a steep reduction in computation time (as much as several thousand times faster, depending on the algorithm for deeper networks) while yielding Lipschitz bounds that are very close to or even better than those achieved by state-of-the-art approaches in a broad range of experiments. In summary, our approach considerably advances the scalability and efficiency of certifying neural network robustness, making it particularly attractive for online learning tasks.
Yuezhu Xu, S. Sivaranjani
NeurIPS2