Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Panpan Qi
dblp:203/7456
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Malware analysis · 46% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 30% Systems and software security · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MAD-SGCN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection with Self-learning Graph Convolutional Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › time series anomaly detection
multivariate time series anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MAD-SGCN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection with Self-learning Graph Convolutional Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Systems and software security › binary analysis
API call analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dynamic Malware Analysis with Feature Engineering and Feature Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Malware analysis
dynamic malware analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dynamic Malware Analysis with Feature Engineering and Feature Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Malware analysis
malware detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dynamic Malware Analysis with Feature Engineering and Feature Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MAD-SGCN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection with Self-learning Graph Convolutional Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised graph structure learning · 1.7graph convolutional network · 1.7LSTM · 1.7gated CNN · 0.4feature hashing · 0.4bidirectional LSTM · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MAD-SGCN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection with Self-learning Graph Convolutional NetworksabstractToday's Cyber Physical Systems (CPSs) are large and complex data-intensive systems. Constant monitoring and analysis of the data generated by a multitude of interconnected sensors and actuators are required in order to detect anomalies due to possible intrusions or faults with high accuracy and timeliness. Recently, unsupervised anomaly detection techniques based on deep learning for multivariate time series have been proposed for detecting CPSs attacks with promising performance. However, the current methods are either limited by their representation learning methods in encoding the temporal and spatial information simultaneously and effectively, or cannot easily scale to other tasks without having explicit knowledge of the internal relationships between the different variables or sensors, which are both important for characterising CPSs data. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised anomaly detection method for multivariate time series MAD-SGCN which effectively captures the temporal and spatial correlations of the input sequences simultaneously using Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) and spectral-based Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs). We design a self-supervised graph structure learning mechanism to minimize the usage of the prior knowledge about the network structures of the CPSs. Experiments on four CPS datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method. Panpan Qi, Dan Li 0016, See-Kiong Ng |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2021 | Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Static Malware Detection based on Gradient Boosting TreesabstractStatic malware detection is important for protection against malware by allowing for malicious files to be detected prior to execution. It is also especially suitable for machine learning-based approaches. Recently, gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT) models, e.g., LightGBM (a popular implementation of GBDT), have shown outstanding performance for malware detection. However, as malware programs are known to evolve rapidly, malware classification models trained on the (source) training data often fail to generalize to the target domain, i.e., the deployed environment. To handle the underlying data distribution drifts, unsupervised domain adaptation techniques have been proposed for machine learning models including deep learning models. However, unsupervised domain adaptation for GBDT has remained challenging. In this paper, we adapt the adversarial learning framework for unsupervised domain adaptation to enable GBDT learn domain-invariant features and alleviate performance degradation in the target domain. In addition, to fully exploit the unlabelled target data, we merge them into the training dataset after pseudo-labelling. We propose a new weighting scheme integrated into GBDT for sampling instances in each boosting round to reduce the negative impact of wrongly labelled target instances. Experiments on two large malware datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method. Panpan Qi, Wei Wang 0059, Lei Zhu 0015, See-Kiong Ng |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2020 | Dynamic Malware Analysis with Feature Engineering and Feature LearningabstractDynamic malware analysis executes the program in an isolated environment and monitors its run-time behaviour (e.g. system API calls) for malware detection. This technique has been proven to be effective against various code obfuscation techniques and newly released (“zero-day”) malware. However, existing works typically only consider the API name while ignoring the arguments, or require complex feature engineering operations and expert knowledge to process the arguments. In this paper, we propose a novel and low-cost feature extraction approach, and an effective deep neural network architecture for accurate and fast malware detection. Specifically, the feature representation approach utilizes a feature hashing trick to encode the API call arguments associated with the API name. The deep neural network architecture applies multiple Gated-CNNs (convolutional neural networks) to transform the extracted features of each API call. The outputs are further processed through bidirectional LSTM (long-short term memory networks) to learn the sequential correlation among API calls. Experiments show that our solution outperforms baselines significantly on a large real dataset. Valuable insights about feature engineering and architecture design are derived from the ablation study. Zhaoqi Zhang 0002, Panpan Qi, Wei Wang 0059 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Malware Detection by Exploiting Deep Learning over Binary ProgramsabstractMalware evolves rapidly over time, which makes existing solutions being ineffective in detecting newly released malware. Machine learning models that can learn to capture malicious patterns directly from the data play an increasingly important role in malware analysis. However, traditional machine learning models heavily depend on feature engineering. The extracted static features are vulnerable as hackers could create new malware with different feature values to deceive the machine learning models. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end malware detection framework consisting of convolutional neural network, autoencoder and neural decision trees. It learns the features from multiple domains for malware detection without feature engineering. In addition, since anti-virus products should have a very low false alarm rate to avoid annoying users, we propose a special loss function, which optimizes the recall for a fixed low false positive rate (e.g., less than 0.1%). Experiments show that the proposed framework has achieved a better recall than the baseline models, and the derived loss function also makes a difference. Panpan Qi, Zhaoqi Zhang 0002, Wei Wang 0059, Chang Yao 0001 |
ICPR | 1 |