Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philip Teare
dblp:203/7713 · also Philip Alexander Teare
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 37% Vision and language · 29% Generative modeling · 22% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Diffusion Instruction Tuning · ICML 2025 Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusion · ECCV (81) 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-modal transfer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Instruction Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
inference-time techniques |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balancing Act: Diversity and Consistency in Large Language Model Ensembles · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Instruction Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
language-guided segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segment Anyword: Mask Prompt Inversion for Open-Set Grounded Segmentation · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model ensemble |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balancing Act: Diversity and Consistency in Large Language Model Ensembles · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents › LLM collaboration
mixture of agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balancing Act: Diversity and Consistency in Large Language Model Ensembles · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › open-world segmentation
open-set segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segment Anyword: Mask Prompt Inversion for Open-Set Grounded Segmentation · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
self-consistency decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Balancing Act: Diversity and Consistency in Large Language Model Ensembles · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Instruction Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusion · ECCV (81) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image translation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusion · ECCV (81) 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Image is Worth Multiple Words: Discovering Object Level Concepts using Multi-Concept Prompt Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Image is Worth Multiple Words: Discovering Object Level Concepts using Multi-Concept Prompt Learning · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 0.9stable diffusion · 0.9prompt regularization · 0.9mixture refinement · 0.9ensemble gating · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9cross-validation · 0.9cross-attention · 0.9attention alignment · 0.9image translation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Balancing Act: Diversity and Consistency in Large Language Model EnsemblesabstractEnsembling strategies for Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in improving performance across various tasks by combining the strengths of individual models. However, identifying the most effective ensembling method remains an open challenge, as neither maximizing output consistency through self-consistency decoding nor enhancing model diversity via frameworks like "Mixture of Agents" has proven universally optimal. Motivated by this, we propose a unified framework to examine the trade-offs between task performance, model diversity, and output consistency in ensembles. More specifically, we introduce a consistency score that defines a gating mechanism for mixtures of agents and an algorithm for mixture refinement to investigate these trade-offs at the semantic and model levels, respectively. We incorporate our insights into a novel inference-time LLM ensembling strategy called the Dynamic Mixture of Agents (DMoA) and demonstrate that it achieves a new state-of-the-art result in the challenging Big Bench Hard mixed evaluations benchmark. Our analysis reveals that cross-validation bias can enhance performance, contingent on the expertise of the constituent models. We further demonstrate that distinct reasoning tasks—such as arithmetic reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and instruction following—require different model capabilities, leading to inherent task-dependent trade-offs that DMoA balances effectively. Ahmed Abdulaal, Nina Montaña Brown, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Daniel C. Castro, Daniel C. Alexander, Philip Teare, Tom Diethe, Dino Oglic, Amrutha Saseendran |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2025 | Diffusion Instruction TuningabstractWe introduce Lavender, a simple supervised fine-tuning (SFT) method that boosts the performance of advanced vision-language models (VLMs) by leveraging state-of-the-art image generation models such as Stable Diffusion. Specifically, Lavender aligns the text-vision attention in the VLM transformer with the equivalent used by Stable Diffusion during SFT, instead of adapting separate encoders. This alignment enriches the model’s visual understanding and significantly boosts performance across in- and out-of-distribution tasks. Lavender requires just 0.13 million training examples—2.5% of typical large-scale SFT datasets—and fine-tunes on standard hardware (8 GPUs) in a single day. It consistently improves state-of-the-art open-source multimodal LLMs (e.g., Llama-3.2-11B, MiniCPM-Llama3-v2.5), achieving up to 30% gains and a 68% boost on challenging out-of-distribution medical QA tasks. By efficiently transferring the visual expertise of image generators with minimal supervision, Lavender offers a scalable solution for more accurate vision-language systems. Code, training data, and models are available on the project page. Ryutaro Tanno, Amrutha Saseendran, Tom Diethe, Philip Teare |
ICML | 5 |
| 2025 | Segment Anyword: Mask Prompt Inversion for Open-Set Grounded SegmentationabstractOpen-set image segmentation poses a significant challenge because existing methods often demand extensive training or fine-tuning and generally struggle to segment unified objects consistently across diverse text reference expressions. Motivated by this, we propose Segment Anyword, a novel training-free visual concept prompt learning approach for open-set language grounded segmentation that relies on token-level cross-attention maps from a frozen diffusion model to produce segmentation surrogates or *mask prompts*, which are then refined into targeted object masks. Initial prompts typically lack coherence and consistency as the complexity of the image-text increases, resulting in suboptimal mask fragments. To tackle this issue, we further introduce a novel linguistic-guided visual prompt regularization that binds and clusters visual prompts based on sentence dependency and syntactic structural information, enabling the extraction of robust, noise-tolerant mask prompts, and significant improvements in segmentation accuracy. The proposed approach is effective, generalizes across different open-set segmentation tasks, and achieves state-of-the-art results of 52.5 (+6.8 relative) mIoU on Pascal Context 59, 67.73 (+25.73 relative) cIoU on gRefCOCO, and 67.4 (+1.1 relative to fine-tuned methods) mIoU on GranDf, which is the most complex open-set grounded segmentation task in the field. Amrutha Saseendran, Xilin He, Fariba Yousefi, Nikolay Burlutskiy, Dino Oglic, Tom Diethe, Philip Teare, Huiyu Zhou 0001 |
ICML | 9 |
| 2024 | Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusion
Seunghoi Kim, Tom Diethe, Matteo Figini, Henry F. J. Tregidgo, Asher Mullokandov, Philip Teare, Daniel C. Alexander |
ECCV (81) | 7 |
| 2024 | An Image is Worth Multiple Words: Discovering Object Level Concepts using Multi-Concept Prompt LearningabstractTextural Inversion, a prompt learning method, learns a singular text embedding for a new "word" to represent image style and appearance, allowing it to be integrated into natural language sentences to generate novel synthesised images. However, identifying multiple unknown object-level concepts within one scene remains a complex challenge. While recent methods have resorted to cropping or masking individual images to learn multiple concepts, these techniques often require prior knowledge of new concepts and are labour-intensive. To address this challenge, we introduce *Multi-Concept Prompt Learning (MCPL)*, where multiple unknown "words" are simultaneously learned from a single sentence-image pair, without any imagery annotations. To enhance the accuracy of word-concept correlation and refine attention mask boundaries, we propose three regularisation techniques: *Attention Masking*, *Prompts Contrastive Loss*, and *Bind Adjective*. Extensive quantitative comparisons with both real-world categories and biomedical images demonstrate that our method can learn new semantically disentangled concepts. Our approach emphasises learning solely from textual embeddings, using less than 10% of the storage space compared to others. The project page, code, and data are available at [https://astrazeneca.github.io/mcpl.github.io](https://astrazeneca.github.io/mcpl.github.io). Ryutaro Tanno, Amrutha Saseendran, Tom Diethe, Philip Teare |
ICML | 5 |