Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Grisaitis
dblp:203/8058
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-1768-2381ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › biomedical image segmentation
neuron segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured loss · 0.8region agglomeration · 0.8affinity prediction · 0.83d u-net · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss Based Deep Learning for Connectome ReconstructionabstractWe present a method combining affinity prediction with region agglomeration, which improves significantly upon the state of the art of neuron segmentation from electron microscopy (EM) in accuracy and scalability. Our method consists of a 3D U-Net, trained to predict affinities between voxels, followed by iterative region agglomeration. We train using a structured loss based on Malis, encouraging topologically correct segmentations obtained from affinity thresholding. Our extension consists of two parts: First, we present a quasi-linear method to compute the loss gradient, improving over the original quadratic algorithm. Second, we compute the gradient in two separate passes to avoid spurious gradient contributions in early training stages. Our predictions are accurate enough that simple learning-free percentile-based agglomeration outperforms more involved methods used earlier on inferior predictions. We present results on three diverse EM datasets, achieving relative improvements over previous results of 27, 15, and 250 percent. Our findings suggest that a single method can be applied to both nearly isotropic block-face EM data and anisotropic serial sectioned EM data. The runtime of our method scales linearly with the size of the volume and achieves a throughput of $\sim$∼ 2.6 seconds per megavoxel, qualifying our method for the processing of very large datasets. Jan Funke, Fabian Tschopp, William Grisaitis, Arlo Sheridan, Chandan Singh, Stephan Saalfeld, Srinivas C. Turaga |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |