EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz
dblp:203/8275
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0001-5100-519XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 12% Generative modeling · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Automated reasoning and model checking · 25% Algorithms and data structures · 25% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Simple Guard for Learned Optimizers · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Simple Guard for Learned Optimizers · ICML 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Recurrent Ladder Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
iterative inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Recurrent Ladder Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
ladder networks |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Recurrent Ladder Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic programming · 1.0deep reinforcement learning · 1.0constraint programming · 1.0gradient descent · 0.6adam · 0.6SGD · 0.6unsupervised learning · 0.3temporal modeling · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Simple Guard for Learned OptimizersabstractIf the trend of learned components eventually outperforming their hand-crafted version continues, learned optimizers will eventually outperform hand-crafted optimizers like SGD or Adam. Even if learned optimizers (L2Os) eventually outpace hand-crafted ones in practice however, they are still not provably convergent and might fail out of distribution. These are the questions addressed here. Currently, learned optimizers frequently outperform generic hand-crafted optimizers (such as gradient descent) at the beginning of learning but they generally plateau after some time while the generic algorithms continue to make progress and often overtake the learned algorithm as Aesop’s tortoise which overtakes the hare. L2Os also still have a difficult time generalizing out of distribution. \cite{heaton_safeguarded_2020} proposed Safeguarded L2O (GL2O) which can take a learned optimizer and safeguard it with a generic learning algorithm so that by conditionally switching between the two, the resulting algorithm is provably convergent. We propose a new class of Safeguarded L2O, called Loss-Guarded L2O (LGL2O), which is both conceptually simpler and computationally less expensive. The guarding mechanism decides solely based on the expected future loss value of both optimizers. Furthermore, we show theoretical proof of LGL2O’s convergence guarantee and empirical results comparing to GL2O and other baselines showing that it combines the best of both L2O and SGD and that in practice converges much better than GL2O. Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz, Jaroslav Vitku, Jan Feyereisl |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Improving Variable Orderings of Approximate Decision Diagrams Using Reinforcement LearningabstractPrescriptive analytics provides organizations with scalable solutions for large-scale, automated decision making. At the core of prescriptive analytics methodology is optimization, a field devoted to the study of algorithms that solve complex decision-making problems. Optimization algorithms rely heavily on generic methods for identifying tight bounds, which provide both solutions to problems and optimality guarantees. In the last decade, decision diagrams (DDs) have demonstrated significant advantages in obtaining bounds compared with the standard linear relaxation commonly used by commercial solvers. However, the quality of the bounds computed by DDs depends heavily on the variable ordering chosen for the construction. Besides, the problem of finding an ordering that optimizes a given metric is generally NP-hard. This paper studies how machine learning, specifically deep reinforcement learning (DRL), can be used to improve bounds provided by DDs, in particular through learning a good variable ordering. The introduced DRL models improve primal and dual bounds, even over standard linear programming relaxations, and are integrated in a full-fledged branch-and-bound algorithm. This paper, therefore, provides a novel mechanism for utilizing machine learning to tighten bounds, adding to recent research on using machine learning to obtain high-quality heuristic solutions and, for the first time, using machine learning to improve relaxation bounds through a generic bounding method. We apply the methods on a classic optimization problem, the maximum independent set, and demonstrate through computational testing that optimization bounds can be significantly improved through DRL. We provide the code to replicate the results obtained on the maximum independent set. Summary of Contribution: This paper studies the use of reinforcement learning to compute a variable ordering of decision diagram-based approximations for discrete optimization problems. This is among the first works to propose the use of machine learning to improve upon generic bounding methods for discrete optimization problems, thereby establishing a critical bridge between optimization and learning. Quentin Cappart, David Bergman, Louis-Martin Rousseau, Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz, Augustin Parjadis |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 4 |
| 2021 | Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial OptimizationabstractCombinatorial optimization has found applications in numerous fields, from aerospace to transportation planning and economics. The goal is to find an optimal solution among a finite set of possibilities. The well-known challenge one faces with combinatorial optimization is the state-space explosion problem: the number of possibilities grows exponentially with the problem size, which makes solving intractable for large problems. In the last years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has shown its promise for designing good heuristics dedicated to solve NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. However, current approaches have an important shortcoming: they only provide an approximate solution with no systematic ways to improve it or to prove optimality. In another context, constraint programming (CP) is a generic tool to solve combinatorial optimization problems. Based on a complete search procedure, it will always find the optimal solution if we allow an execution time large enough. A critical design choice, that makes CP non-trivial to use in practice, is the branching decision, directing how the search space is explored. In this work, we propose a general and hybrid approach, based on DRL and CP, for solving combinatorial optimization problems. The core of our approach is based on a dynamic programming formulation, that acts as a bridge between both techniques. We experimentally show that our solver is efficient to solve three challenging problems: the traveling salesman problem with time windows, the 4-moments portfolio optimization problem, and the 0-1 knapsack problem. Results obtained show that the framework introduced outperforms the stand-alone RL and CP solutions, while being competitive with industrial solvers. Quentin Cappart, Thierry Moisan, Louis-Martin Rousseau, Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz, André Augusto Ciré |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Recurrent Ladder NetworksabstractWe propose a recurrent extension of the Ladder networks whose structure is motivated by the inference required in hierarchical latent variable models. We demonstrate that the recurrent Ladder is able to handle a wide variety of complex learning tasks that benefit from iterative inference and temporal modeling. The architecture shows close-to-optimal results on temporal modeling of video data, competitive results on music modeling, and improved perceptual grouping based on higher order abstractions, such as stochastic textures and motion cues. We present results for fully supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised tasks. The results suggest that the proposed architecture and principles are powerful tools for learning a hierarchy of abstractions, learning iterative inference and handling temporal information. Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz, Alexander Ilin, Tele Hao, Antti Rasmus, Rinu Boney, Harri Valpola |
NIPS | 1 |