Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kavinayan Sivakumar

dblp:203/8631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 39% Multi-agent systems · 30% Reinforcement learning · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent coordination
distributed multi-agent coordination
0.312018
Near-Optimal Adversarial Policy Switching for Decentralized Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.312018
Near-Optimal Adversarial Policy Switching for Decentralized Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems · ICRA 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › policy synthesis
robust policy synthesis
0.312018
Near-Optimal Adversarial Policy Switching for Decentralized Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems · ICRA 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.112018
Near-Optimal Adversarial Policy Switching for Decentralized Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy optimization · 0.3game theory · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Near-Optimal Adversarial Policy Switching for Decentralized Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems
abstract
A key challenge in multi-robot and multi-agent systems is generating solutions that are robust to other self-interested or even adversarial parties who actively try to prevent the agents from achieving their goals. The practicality of existing works addressing this challenge is limited to only small-scale synchronous decision-making scenarios or a single agent planning its best response against a single adversary with fixed, procedurally characterized strategies. In contrast this paper considers a more realistic class of problems where a team of asynchronous agents with limited observation and communication capabilities need to compete against multiple strategic adversaries with changing strategies. This problem necessitates agents that can coordinate to detect changes in adversary strategies and plan the best response accordingly. Our approach first optimizes a set of stratagems that represent these best responses. These optimized stratagems are then integrated into a unified policy that can detect and respond when the adversaries change their strategies. The near-optimality of the proposed framework is established theoretically as well as demonstrated empirically in simulation and hardware.
Trong Nghia Hoang, Kavinayan Sivakumar, Christopher Amato, Jonathan P. How
ICRA3
2017 Learning for multi-robot cooperation in partially observable stochastic environments with macro-actions
abstract
This paper presents a data-driven approach for multi-robot coordination in partially-observable domains based on Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (Dec-POMDPs) and macro-actions (MAs). Dec-POMDPs provide a general framework for cooperative sequential decision making under uncertainty and MAs allow temporally extended and asynchronous action execution. To date, most methods assume the underlying Dec-POMDP model is known a priori or a full simulator is available during planning time. Previous methods which aim to address these issues suffer from local optimality and sensitivity to initial conditions. Additionally, few hardware demonstrations involving a large team of heterogeneous robots and with long planning horizons exist. This work addresses these gaps by proposing an iterative sampling based Expectation-Maximization algorithm (iSEM) to learn polices using only trajectory data containing observations, MAs, and rewards. Our experiments show the algorithm is able to achieve better solution quality than the state-of-the-art learning-based methods. We implement two variants of multi-robot Search and Rescue (SAR) domains (with and without obstacles) on hardware to demonstrate the learned policies can effectively control a team of distributed robots to cooperate in a partially observable stochastic environment.
Miao Liu 0001, Kavinayan Sivakumar, Shayegan Omidshafiei, Christopher Amato, Jonathan P. How
IROS2