EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johann Sawatzky
dblp:203/8632
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 36% Segmentation and scene understanding · 27% Graph learning · 18% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | What Object Should I Use? - Task Driven Object Detection · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | What Object Should I Use? - Task Driven Object Detection · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
task-driven object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | What Object Should I Use? - Task Driven Object Detection · CVPR 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › object perception
affordance detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Weakly Supervised Affordance Detection · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
multi-label segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Weakly Supervised Affordance Detection · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Weakly Supervised Affordance Detection · CVPR 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | What Object Should I Use? - Task Driven Object Detection · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gated graph neural network · 0.4weak supervision · 0.3keypoint annotation · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | What Object Should I Use? - Task Driven Object DetectionabstractWhen humans have to solve everyday tasks, they simply pick the objects that are most suitable. While the question which object should one use for a specific task sounds trivial for humans, it is very difficult to answer for robots or other autonomous systems. This issue, however, is not addressed by current benchmarks for object detection that focus on detecting object categories. We therefore introduce the COCO-Tasks dataset which comprises about 40,000 images where the most suitable objects for 14 tasks have been annotated. We furthermore propose an approach that detects the most suitable objects for a given task. The approach builds on a Gated Graph Neural Network to exploit the appearance of each object as well as the global context of all present objects in the scene. In our experiments, we show that the proposed approach outperforms other approaches that are evaluated on the dataset like classification or ranking approaches. Johann Sawatzky, Yaser Souri, Christian Grund, Juergen Gall |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2017 | Weakly Supervised Affordance DetectionabstractLocalizing functional regions of objects or affordances is an important aspect of scene understanding and relevant for many robotics applications. In this work, we introduce a pixel-wise annotated affordance dataset of 3090 images containing 9916 object instances. Since parts of an object can have multiple affordances, we address this by a convolutional neural network for multilabel affordance segmentation. We also propose an approach to train the network from very few keypoint annotations. Our approach achieves a higher affordance detection accuracy than other weakly supervised methods that also rely on keypoint annotations or image annotations as weak supervision. Johann Sawatzky, Abhilash Srikantha, Juergen Gall |
CVPR | 1 |