EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Avital Oliver
dblp:203/8700
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Learning paradigms · 21% Efficient and distributed learning · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Patch n' Pack: NaViT, a Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and Resolution · NeurIPS 2023 Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
1.1 | 3 | 2019 | MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learning · ICCV 2019 Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computing education
AI education |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020 · AAAI 2020 Model AI Assignments 2019 · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › vision transformer
vision transformer scaling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
consistency regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learning · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
mixup |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness trade-off
fairness-accuracy trade-off |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness and robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence packing · 0.7reimplementation · 0.7linear probing on frozen features · 0.7large-scale pretraining · 0.7contrastive pre-training · 0.7benchmark evaluation · 0.7self-supervised semi-supervised learning · 0.4mixup · 0.4entropy minimization · 0.4data augmentation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion ParametersabstractThe scaling of Transformers has driven breakthrough capabilities for language models. At present, the largest large language models (LLMs) contain upwards of 100B parameters. Vision Transformers (ViT) have introduced the same architecture to image and video modelling, but these have not yet been successfully scaled to nearly the same degree; the largest dense ViT contains 4B parameters (Chen et al., 2022). We present a recipe for highly efficient and stable training of a 22B-parameter ViT (ViT-22B) and perform a wide variety of experiments on the resulting model. When evaluated on downstream tasks (often with a lightweight linear model on frozen features), ViT-22B demonstrates increasing performance with scale. We further observe other interesting benefits of scale, including an improved tradeoff between fairness and performance, state-of-the-art alignment to human visual perception in terms of shape/texture bias, and improved robustness. ViT-22B demonstrates the potential for "LLM-like" scaling in vision, and provides key steps towards getting there. Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski, Jonathan Heek, Justin Gilmer, Andreas Steiner 0001, Mathilde Caron, Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Rodolphe Jenatton, Lucas Beyer, Michael Tschannen, Anurag Arnab, Xiao Wang 0038, Carlos Riquelme, Matthias Minderer, Joan Puigcerver, Utku Evci, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Gamaleldin F. Elsayed, Aravindh Mahendran, Fisher Yu 0001, Avital Oliver, Fantine Huot, Jasmijn Bastings, Mark Collier, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Vighnesh Birodkar, Cristina Nader Vasconcelos, Yi Tay, Thomas Mensink, Alexander Kolesnikov 0003, Filip Pavetic, Dustin Tran, Thomas Kipf, Mario Lucic, Xiaohua Zhai, Daniel Keysers, Jeremiah J. Harmsen, Neil Houlsby |
ICML | 25 |
| 2023 | Patch n' Pack: NaViT, a Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and ResolutionabstractThe ubiquitous and demonstrably suboptimal choice of resizing images to a fixed resolution before processing them with computer vision models has not yet been successfully challenged. However, models such as the Vision Transformer (ViT) offer flexible sequence-based modeling, and hence varying input sequence lengths. We take advantage of this with NaViT (Native Resolution ViT) which uses sequence packing during training to process inputs of arbitrary resolutions and aspect ratios. Alongside flexible model usage, we demonstrate improved training efficiency for large-scale supervised and contrastive image-text pretraining.
NaViT can be efficiently transferred to standard tasks such as image and video classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation and leads to improved results on robustness and fairness benchmarks. At inference time, the input resolution flexibility can be used to smoothly navigate the test-time cost-performance trade-off. We believe that NaViTmarks a departure from the standard, CNN-designed, input and modelling pipeline used by most computer vision models, and represents a promising direction for ViTs. Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Basil Mustafa, Josip Djolonga, Jonathan Heek, Matthias Minderer, Mathilde Caron, Andreas Steiner 0001, Joan Puigcerver, Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Avital Oliver, Piotr Padlewski, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Mario Lucic, Neil Houlsby |
NeurIPS | 11 |
| 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of nine AI assignments from the 2020 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http://modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Stephen Keeley, Michael Guerzhoy, Wolfgang Hönig, Jiaoyang Li 0001, Sven Koenig, Ameet Soni, Krista Thomason, Lisa Zhang 0003, Bibin Sebastian, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, James Allingham, Sejong Yoon, Jonathan Chen, Tom Larsen, Marion Neumann, Narges Norouzi, Ryan Hausen, Matthew Evett |
AAAI | 12 |
| 2020 | Teacher-Student Curriculum LearningabstractWe propose Teacher-Student Curriculum Learning (TSCL), a framework for automatic curriculum learning, where the Student tries to learn a complex task, and the Teacher automatically chooses subtasks from a given set for the Student to train on. We describe a family of Teacher algorithms that rely on the intuition that the Student should practice more those tasks on which it makes the fastest progress, i.e., where the slope of the learning curve is highest. In addition, the Teacher algorithms address the problem of forgetting by also choosing tasks where the Student's performance is getting worse. We demonstrate that TSCL matches or surpasses the results of carefully hand-crafted curricula in two tasks: addition of decimal numbers with long short-term memory (LSTM) and navigation in Minecraft. Our automatically ordered curriculum of submazes enabled to solve a Minecraft maze that could not be solved at all when training directly on that maze, and the learning was an order of magnitude faster than a uniform sampling of those submazes. Tambet Matiisen, Avital Oliver, Taco Cohen, John Schulman |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 2 |
| 2019 | Model AI Assignments 2019abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of ten AI assignments from the 2019 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http: //modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Raja Sooriamurthi, Michael Guerzhoy, Lisa Zhang 0003, Paul G. Talaga, Christopher Archibald, Adam Summerville, Joseph C. Osborn, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Nate Derbinsky, Elena Strange, Marion Neumann, Jonathan Chen, Zac Christensen, Michael Wollowski, Oscar Youngquist |
AAAI | 10 |
| 2019 | S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised LearningabstractThis work tackles the problem of semi-supervised learning of image classifiers. Our main insight is that the field of semi-supervised learning can benefit from the quickly advancing field of self-supervised visual representation learning. Unifying these two approaches, we propose the framework of self-supervised semi-supervised learning (S4L) and use it to derive two novel semi-supervised image classification methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods in comparison to both carefully tuned baselines, and existing semi-supervised learning methods. We then show that S4L and existing semi-supervised methods can be jointly trained, yielding a new state-of-the-art result on semi-supervised ILSVRC-2012 with 10% of labels. Lucas Beyer, Xiaohua Zhai, Avital Oliver, Alexander Kolesnikov 0003 |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2019 | MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised LearningabstractSemi-supervised learning has proven to be a powerful paradigm for leveraging unlabeled data to mitigate the reliance on large labeled datasets. In this work, we unify the current dominant approaches for semi-supervised learning to produce a new algorithm, MixMatch, that guesses low-entropy labels for data-augmented unlabeled examples and mixes labeled and unlabeled data using MixUp. MixMatch obtains state-of-the-art results by a large margin across many datasets and labeled data amounts. For example, on CIFAR-10 with 250 labels, we reduce error rate by a factor of 4 (from 38% to 11%) and by a factor of 2 on STL-10. We also demonstrate how MixMatch can help achieve a dramatically better accuracy-privacy trade-off for differential privacy. Finally, we perform an ablation study to tease apart which components of MixMatch are most important for its success. Code is attached. David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Ian J. Goodfellow, Nicolas Papernot, Avital Oliver, Colin Raffel |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2018 | Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning AlgorithmsabstractSemi-supervised learning (SSL) provides a powerful framework for leveraging unlabeled data when labels are limited or expensive to obtain. SSL algorithms based on deep neural networks have recently proven successful on standard benchmark tasks. However, we argue that these benchmarks fail to address many issues that SSL algorithms would face in real-world applications. After creating a unified reimplementation of various widely-used SSL techniques, we test them in a suite of experiments designed to address these issues. We find that the performance of simple baselines which do not use unlabeled data is often underreported, SSL methods differ in sensitivity to the amount of labeled and unlabeled data, and performance can degrade substantially when the unlabeled dataset contains out-of-distribution examples. To help guide SSL research towards real-world applicability, we make our unified reimplemention and evaluation platform publicly available. Avital Oliver, Augustus Odena, Colin Raffel, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Ian J. Goodfellow |
NeurIPS | 1 |