Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rafael Glater
dblp:204/0090
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0009-3828-492XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
self-attention analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval
query understanding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Intent-Aware Semantic Query Annotation · SIGIR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
position embedding · 0.7markov random field · 0.3learning to rank · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question AnsweringabstractExtractive Transformer-based models for question answering (QA) are trained to predict the start and end position of the answer in a candidate paragraph. However, the true answer position can bias these models when its distribution in the training data is highly skewed. That is, models trained only with the answer at the beginning of the paragraph will perform poorly on test instances with the answer at the end. Many studies have focused on countering answer position bias but have yet to deepen our understanding of how such bias manifests in the main components of the Transformer. In this paper, we analyze the self-attention and embedding generation components of five Transformer-based models with different architectures and position embedding strategies. Our analysis shows that models tend to map position bias in their attention matrices, generating embeddings that correlate the answer and its biased position, ultimately compromising model generalization. Rafael Glater, Rodrygo L. T. Santos |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2017 | Intent-Aware Semantic Query AnnotationabstractQuery understanding is a challenging task primarily due to the inherent ambiguity of natural language. A common strategy for improving the understanding of natural language queries is to annotate them with semantic information mined from a knowledge base. Nevertheless, queries with different intents may arguably benefit from specialized annotation strategies. For instance, some queries could be effectively annotated with a single entity or an entity attribute, others could be better represented by a list of entities of a single type or by entities of multiple distinct types, and others may be simply ambiguous. In this paper, we propose a framework for learning semantic query annotations suitable to the target intent of each individual query. Thorough experiments on a publicly available benchmark show that our proposed approach can significantly improve state-of-the-art intent-agnostic approaches based on Markov random fields and learning to rank. Our results further demonstrate the consistent effectiveness of our approach for queries of various target intents, lengths, and difficulty levels, as well as its robustness to noise in intent detection. Rafael Glater, Rodrygo L. T. Santos, Nivio Ziviani |
SIGIR | 1 |