Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rafael Glater

dblp:204/0090 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0009-3828-492XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering
0.712023
On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
self-attention analysis
0.712023
On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer analysis
0.712023
On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.312017
Intent-Aware Semantic Query Annotation · SIGIR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

position embedding · 0.7markov random field · 0.3learning to rank · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On Answer Position Bias in Transformers for Question Answering
abstract
Extractive Transformer-based models for question answering (QA) are trained to predict the start and end position of the answer in a candidate paragraph. However, the true answer position can bias these models when its distribution in the training data is highly skewed. That is, models trained only with the answer at the beginning of the paragraph will perform poorly on test instances with the answer at the end. Many studies have focused on countering answer position bias but have yet to deepen our understanding of how such bias manifests in the main components of the Transformer. In this paper, we analyze the self-attention and embedding generation components of five Transformer-based models with different architectures and position embedding strategies. Our analysis shows that models tend to map position bias in their attention matrices, generating embeddings that correlate the answer and its biased position, ultimately compromising model generalization.
Rafael Glater, Rodrygo L. T. Santos
SIGIR1
2017 Intent-Aware Semantic Query Annotation
abstract
Query understanding is a challenging task primarily due to the inherent ambiguity of natural language. A common strategy for improving the understanding of natural language queries is to annotate them with semantic information mined from a knowledge base. Nevertheless, queries with different intents may arguably benefit from specialized annotation strategies. For instance, some queries could be effectively annotated with a single entity or an entity attribute, others could be better represented by a list of entities of a single type or by entities of multiple distinct types, and others may be simply ambiguous. In this paper, we propose a framework for learning semantic query annotations suitable to the target intent of each individual query. Thorough experiments on a publicly available benchmark show that our proposed approach can significantly improve state-of-the-art intent-agnostic approaches based on Markov random fields and learning to rank. Our results further demonstrate the consistent effectiveness of our approach for queries of various target intents, lengths, and difficulty levels, as well as its robustness to noise in intent detection.
Rafael Glater, Rodrygo L. T. Santos, Nivio Ziviani
SIGIR1