Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noga Talmor

dblp:204/2936 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › security games
adversarial patrolling
0.312017
On the Power and Limitations of Deception in Multi-Robot Adversarial Patrolling · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › strategic behavior
deception
0.312017
On the Power and Limitations of Deception in Multi-Robot Adversarial Patrolling · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot coordination
multi-robot patrolling
0.312017
On the Power and Limitations of Deception in Multi-Robot Adversarial Patrolling · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomization · 0.3game theory · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 On the Power and Limitations of Deception in Multi-Robot Adversarial Patrolling
abstract
Multi-robot adversarial patrolling is a well studied problem, investigating how defenders can optimally use all given resources for maximizing the probability of detecting penetrations, that are controlled by an adversary. It is commonly assumed that the adversary in this problem is rational, thus uses the knowledge it has on the patrolling robots (namely, the number of robots, their location, characteristics and strategy) to optimize its own chances to penetrate successfully. In this paper we present a novel defending approach which manipulates the adversarial (possibly partial) knowledge on the patrolling robots, so that it will believe the robots have more power than they actually have. We describe two different ways of deceiving the adversary: Window Deception, in which it is assumed that the adversary has partial observability of the perimeter, and Scarecrow Deception, in which some of the patrolling robots only appear as real robots, though they have no ability to actually detect the adversary. We analyze the limitations of both models, and suggest a random-based approach for optimally deceiving the adversary that considers both the resources of the defenders, and the adversarial knowledge.
Noga Talmor, Noa Agmon
IJCAI1