Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noah Dunstatter

dblp:204/2979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection › alert processing
alert triage
0.312017
Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts · IJCAI 2017
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.312017
Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.312017
Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
optimal resource allocation
0.312017
Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts · IJCAI 2017
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
security games
0.312017
Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic · 0.6game theory · 0.6NP-hardness proof · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Don't Bury your Head in Warnings: A Game-Theoretic Approach for Intelligent Allocation of Cyber-security Alerts
abstract
In recent years, there have been a number of successful cyber attacks on enterprise networks by malicious actors which have caused severe damage. These networks have Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems in place to protect them, but they are notorious for producing a high volume of alerts. These alerts must be investigated by cyber analysts to determine whether they are an attack or benign. Unfortunately, there are magnitude more alerts generated than there are cyber analysts to investigate them. This trend is expected to continue into the future creating a need for tools which find optimal assignments of the incoming alerts to analysts in the presence of a strategic adversary. We address this challenge with the four following contributions: (1) a cyber screening game (CSG) model for the cyber network protection domain, (2) an NP-hardness proof for computing the optimal strategy for the defender, (3) an algorithm that finds the optimal allocation of experts to alerts in the CSG, and (4) heuristic improvements for computing allocations in CSGs that accomplishes significant scale-up which we show empirically to closely match the solution quality of the optimal algorithm.
Aaron Schlenker, Mina Guirguis, Christopher Kiekintveld, Arunesh Sinha, Milind Tambe, Solomon Y. Sonya, Darryl Balderas, Noah Dunstatter
IJCAI9