Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dina M. Acklin

dblp:204/3000 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › cognitive modeling
cognitive architecture
0.312017
Modeling Bias Reduction Strategies in a Biased Agent · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing
0.312017
Modeling Bias Reduction Strategies in a Biased Agent · IJCAI 2017
Human-AI interaction
decision support
0.112017
Modeling Bias Reduction Strategies in a Biased Agent · IJCAI 2017
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Modeling Bias Reduction Strategies in a Biased Agent
abstract
Costly mistakes can occur when decision makers rely on intuition or learned biases to make decisions. To better understand the cognitive processes that lead to bias and develop strategies to combat it, we developed an intelligent agent using the cognitive architecture, ACT-R 7.0. The agent simulates a human participating in a decision making task designed to assess the effectiveness of bias reduction strategies. The agent's performance is compared to that of human participants completing a similar task. Similar results support the underlying cognitive theories and reveal limitations of reducing bias in human decision making. This should provide insights for designing intelligent agents that can reason about bias while supporting decision makers.
Jaelle Scheuerman, Dina M. Acklin
IJCAI2