EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yen-Shi Wang
dblp:204/3013
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 94% Coding theory · 6% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018 Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
stochastic boolean satisfiability |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018 Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
quantified boolean formula |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › minimum distance decoding
bounded-distance decoding |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
SAT solving · 0.6clause selection · 0.3logic synthesis · 0.3binary decision diagrams · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause SelectionabstractStochastic Boolean satisfiability (SSAT) is an expressive language to formulate decision problems with randomness. Solving SSAT formulas has the same PSPACE-complete computational complexity as solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs). Despite its broad applications and profound theoretical values, SSAT has received relatively little attention compared to QBF. In this paper, we focus on exist-random quantified SSAT formulas, also known as E-MAJSAT, which is a special fragment of SSAT commonly applied in probabilistic conformant planning, posteriori hypothesis, and maximum expected utility. Based on clause selection, a recently proposed QBF technique, we propose an algorithm to solve E-MAJSAT. Moreover, our method can provide an approximate solution to E-MAJSAT with a lower bound when an exact answer is too expensive to compute. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm achieves significant performance gains and memory savings over the state-of-the-art SSAT solvers on a number of benchmark formulas, and provides useful lower bounds for cases where prior methods fail to compute exact answers. Nian-Ze Lee, Yen-Shi Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2017 | Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist QuantificationabstractStochastic Boolean Satisfiability (SSAT) is a powerful formalism to represent computational problems with uncertainly, such as belief network inference and propositional probabilistic planning. Solving SSAT formulas lies in the same complexity class (PSPACE-complete) as solving Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF). While many endeavors have been made to enhance QBF solving, SSAT has drawn relatively less attention in recent years. This paper focuses on random-exist quantified SSAT formulas, and proposes an algorithm combining binary decision diagram (BDD), logic synthesis, and modern SAT techniques to improve computational efficiency. Unlike prior exact SSAT algorithms, the proposed method can be easily modified to solve approximate SSAT by deriving upper and lower bounds of satisfying probability. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm on random k-CNF formulas and has effective application to approximate SSAT on circuit benchmarks. Nian-Ze Lee, Yen-Shi Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang |
IJCAI | 2 |