Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yen-Shi Wang

dblp:204/3013 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 94% Coding theory · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.622018
Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018
Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
stochastic boolean satisfiability
0.622018
Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018
Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
quantified boolean formula
0.112018
Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection · IJCAI 2018
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › minimum distance decoding
bounded-distance decoding
0.112017
Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

SAT solving · 0.6clause selection · 0.3logic synthesis · 0.3binary decision diagrams · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Solving Exist-Random Quantified Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability via Clause Selection
abstract
Stochastic Boolean satisfiability (SSAT) is an expressive language to formulate decision problems with randomness. Solving SSAT formulas has the same PSPACE-complete computational complexity as solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs). Despite its broad applications and profound theoretical values, SSAT has received relatively little attention compared to QBF. In this paper, we focus on exist-random quantified SSAT formulas, also known as E-MAJSAT, which is a special fragment of SSAT commonly applied in probabilistic conformant planning, posteriori hypothesis, and maximum expected utility. Based on clause selection, a recently proposed QBF technique, we propose an algorithm to solve E-MAJSAT. Moreover, our method can provide an approximate solution to E-MAJSAT with a lower bound when an exact answer is too expensive to compute. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm achieves significant performance gains and memory savings over the state-of-the-art SSAT solvers on a number of benchmark formulas, and provides useful lower bounds for cases where prior methods fail to compute exact answers.
Nian-Ze Lee, Yen-Shi Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
IJCAI2
2017 Solving Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability under Random-Exist Quantification
abstract
Stochastic Boolean Satisfiability (SSAT) is a powerful formalism to represent computational problems with uncertainly, such as belief network inference and propositional probabilistic planning. Solving SSAT formulas lies in the same complexity class (PSPACE-complete) as solving Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF). While many endeavors have been made to enhance QBF solving, SSAT has drawn relatively less attention in recent years. This paper focuses on random-exist quantified SSAT formulas, and proposes an algorithm combining binary decision diagram (BDD), logic synthesis, and modern SAT techniques to improve computational efficiency. Unlike prior exact SSAT algorithms, the proposed method can be easily modified to solve approximate SSAT by deriving upper and lower bounds of satisfying probability. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm on random k-CNF formulas and has effective application to approximate SSAT on circuit benchmarks.
Nian-Ze Lee, Yen-Shi Wang, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang
IJCAI2