Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kai Yee Phoebe Chua

dblp:204/3018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › multi-robot exploration
decentralized exploration
0.312017
Coordinated Versus Decentralized Exploration In Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
multi-agent bandit
0.312017
Coordinated Versus Decentralized Exploration In Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.112017
Coordinated Versus Decentralized Exploration In Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value of information · 0.3multiplicative weights update · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Coordinated Versus Decentralized Exploration In Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits
abstract
In this paper, we introduce a multi-agent multi-armed bandit-based model for ad hoc teamwork with expensive communication. The goal of the team is to maximize the total reward gained from pulling arms of a bandit over a number of epochs. In each epoch, each agent decides whether to pull an arm, or to broadcast the reward it obtained in the previous epoch to the team and forgo pulling an arm. These decisions must be made only on the basis of the agent’s private information and the public information broadcast prior to that epoch. We first benchmark the achievable utility by analyzing an idealized version of this problem where a central authority has complete knowledge of rewards acquired from all arms in all epochs and uses a multiplicative weights update algorithm for allocating arms to agents. We then introduce an algorithm for the decentralized setting that uses a value-of-information based communication strategy and an exploration-exploitation strategy based on the centralized algorithm, and show experimentally that it converges rapidly to the performance of the centralized method.
Mithun Chakraborty, Kai Yee Phoebe Chua, Sanmay Das, Brendan Juba
IJCAI2