Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Juan Ignacio Navarro-Horñiacek

dblp:204/3025 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › answer extraction
answer sentence selection
0.312017
Finding Prototypes of Answers for Improving Answer Sentence Selection · IJCAI 2017
Information retrieval › question answering
answer selection
0.312017
Finding Prototypes of Answers for Improving Answer Sentence Selection · IJCAI 2017
Information retrieval
question answering
0.312017
Finding Prototypes of Answers for Improving Answer Sentence Selection · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototype replacement · 0.6neural semantic similarity · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Finding Prototypes of Answers for Improving Answer Sentence Selection
abstract
Answer sentence selection has been widely adopted recently for benchmarking techniques in Question Answering. Previous proposals for the task are essentially general solutions taking the form of neural networks that measure semantic similarity. In contrast, the present paper describes a simple technique to take advantage of such general-purpose tools for dealing with questions and answer sentences without changing the base system. The technique involves replacing wh-words in input questions with a word denoting the prototype of all answers. These transformed questions are passed as input to an existing neural network built for measuring semantic similarity. This technique is evaluated on two different neural network architectures over two datasets: TrecQA and WikiQA. Results of our experiments show improvement in overall accuracy across most question types we are interested in: `who', `when' and `where'-type questions.
Wai Lok Tam, Namgi Han, Juan Ignacio Navarro-Horñiacek, Yusuke Miyao
IJCAI3