Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Takashi Nishibayashi

dblp:204/3380 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining › discriminative pattern mining
emerging pattern mining
0.312017
Statistical Emerging Pattern Mining with Multiple Testing Correction · KDD 2017
Data mining
pattern mining
0.312017
Statistical Emerging Pattern Mining with Multiple Testing Correction · KDD 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

familywise error rate control · 0.3false discovery rate control · 0.3LAMP · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Statistical Emerging Pattern Mining with Multiple Testing Correction
abstract
Emerging patterns are patterns whose support significantly differs between two databases. We study the problem of listing emerging patterns with a multiple testing guarantee. Recently, Terada et al., proposed the Limitless Arity Multiple-testing Procedure (LAMP) that controls the family-wise error rate (FWER) in statistical association mining. LAMP reduces the number of "untestable" hypotheses without compromising its statistical power. Still, FWER is restrictive, and as a result, its statistical power is inherently unsatisfying when the number of patterns is large. On the other hand, the false discovery rate (FDR) is less restrictive than FWER, and thus controlling FDR yields a larger number of significant patterns. We propose two emerging pattern mining methods: the first one controls FWER, and the second one controls FDR. The effectiveness of the methods is verified in computer simulations with real-world datasets.
Junpei Komiyama, Masakazu Ishihata, Hiroki Arimura, Takashi Nishibayashi, Shin-ichi Minato
KDD4