Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyu Hwan Kim

dblp:204/3562 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 93% Cloud and datacenter computing · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Database system architecture and tuning · 41% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 36% Distributed and cloud data management · 12%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › replication
database replication
0.722020
Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Parallel Replication across Formats in SAP HANA for Scaling Out Mixed OLTP/OLAP Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017
Distributed systems › distributed database
commit protocol
0.412020
Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Distributed systems › distributed database
distributed transactions
0.412020
Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Database system architecture and tuning
main-memory database
0.312018
Parallel replication across formats for scaling out mixed OLTP/OLAP workloads in main-memory databases · VLDB J. 2018
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
multiversion concurrency control
0.312017
Parallel Replication across Formats in SAP HANA for Scaling Out Mixed OLTP/OLAP Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017
Distributed systems
distributed database
0.112020
Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter architecture
shared-nothing architecture
0.112020
Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Distributed and cloud data management
data replication
0.112018
Parallel replication across formats for scaling out mixed OLTP/OLAP workloads in main-memory databases · VLDB J. 2018
Indexing and storage engines › storage model
column-store vs row-store
0.112017
Parallel Replication across Formats in SAP HANA for Scaling Out Mixed OLTP/OLAP Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimistic lock-free replay · 0.6optimistic synchronous commit · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Asymmetric-Partition Replication for Highly Scalable Distributed Transaction Processing in Practice
abstract
Database replication is widely known and used for high availability or load balancing in many practical database systems. In this paper, we show how a replication engine can be used for three important practical cases that have not previously been studied very well. The three practical use cases include: 1) scaling out OLTP/OLAP-mixed workloads with partitioned replicas, 2) efficiently maintaining a distributed secondary index for a partitioned table, and 3) efficiently implementing an online re-partitioning operation. All three use cases are crucial for enabling a high-performance shared-nothing distributed database system. To support the three use cases more efficiently, we propose the concept of asymmetric-partition replication , so that replicas of a table can be independently partitioned regardless of whether or how its primary copy is partitioned. In addition, we propose the optimistic synchronous commit protocol which avoids the expensive two-phase commit without sacrificing transactional consistency. The proposed asymmetric-partition replication and its optimized commit protocol are incorporated in the production versions of the SAP HANA in-memory database system. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the significant benefits that the proposed replication engine brings to the three use cases.
Juchang Lee, Hyejeong Lee, Seongyun Ko, Kyu Hwan Kim, Mihnea Andrei, Friedrich Keller, Wook-Shin Han
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2018 Parallel replication across formats for scaling out mixed OLTP/OLAP workloads in main-memory databases
Juchang Lee, Wook-Shin Han, Hyoung Jun Na, Changgyoo Park, Kyu Hwan Kim, Deok Hoe Kim, Joo-Yeon Lee, Sang Kyun Cha, SeungHyun Moon
VLDB J.5
2017 Parallel Replication across Formats in SAP HANA for Scaling Out Mixed OLTP/OLAP Workloads
abstract
Modern in-memory database systems are facing the need of efficiently supporting mixed workloads of OLTP and OLAP. A conventional approach to this requirement is to rely on ETL-style, application-driven data replication between two very different OLTP and OLAP systems, sacrificing real-time reporting on operational data. An alternative approach is to run OLTP and OLAP workloads in a single machine, which eventually limits the maximum scalability of OLAP query performance. In order to tackle this challenging problem, we propose a novel database replication architecture called Asynchronous Parallel Table Replication (ATR). ATR supports OLTP workloads in one primary machine, while it supports heavy OLAP workloads in replicas. Here, row-store formats can be used for OLTP transactions at the primary, while column-store formats are used for OLAP analytical queries at the replicas. ATR is designed to support elastic scalability of OLAP query performance while it minimizes the overhead for transaction processing at the primary and minimizes CPU consumption for replayed transactions at the replicas. ATR employs a novel optimistic lock-free parallel log replay scheme which exploits characteristics of multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) in order to enable real-time reporting by minimizing the propagation delay between the primary and replicas. Through extensive experiments with a concrete implementation available in a commercial database system, we demonstrate that ATR achieves sub-second visibility delay even for update-intensive workloads, providing scalable OLAP performance without notable overhead to the primary.
Juchang Lee, SeungHyun Moon, Kyu Hwan Kim, Deok Hoe Kim, Sang Kyun Cha, Wook-Shin Han, Changgyoo Park, Hyoung Jun Na, Joo-Yeon Lee
Proc. VLDB Endow.3