Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jake Iannacone
dblp:204/3747
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding misunderstandings in source code · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2017 |
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding misunderstandings in source code · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical study · 0.3controlled experiment · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Understanding misunderstandings in source codeabstractHumans often mistake the meaning of source code, and so misjudge a program's true behavior. These mistakes can be caused by extremely small, isolated patterns in code, which can lead to significant runtime errors. These patterns are used in large, popular software projects and even recommended in style guides. To identify code patterns that may confuse programmers we extracted a preliminary set of `atoms of confusion' from known confusing code. We show empirically in an experiment with 73 participants that these code patterns can lead to a significantly increased rate of misunderstanding versus equivalent code without the patterns. We then go on to take larger confusing programs and measure (in an experiment with 43 participants) the impact, in terms of programmer confusion, of removing these confusing patterns. All of our instruments, analysis code, and data are publicly available online for replication, experimentation, and feedback. Daniel Gopstein, Jake Iannacone, Lois DeLong, Yanyan Zhuang, Martin K.-C. Yeh, Justin Cappos |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 2 |