EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liran Gispan
dblp:204/7068
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 91% Reinforcement learning · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
bayesian planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Bayesian Approach to Online Planning · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Bayesian Approach to Online Planning · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
online planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Bayesian Approach to Online Planning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Bayesian Approach to Online Planning · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty quantification · 0.8thompson sampling · 0.8Bayes-UCB · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Bayesian Approach to Online PlanningabstractThe combination of Monte Carlo tree search and neural networks has revolutionized online planning. As neural network approximations are often imperfect, we ask whether uncertainty estimates about the network outputs could be used to improve planning. We develop a Bayesian planning approach that facilitates such uncertainty quantification, inspired by classical ideas from the meta-reasoning literature. We propose a Thompson sampling based algorithm for searching the tree of possible actions, for which we prove the first (to our knowledge) finite time Bayesian regret bound, and propose an efficient implementation for a restricted family of posterior distributions. In addition we propose a variant of the Bayes-UCB method applied to trees. Empirically, we demonstrate that on the ProcGen Maze and Leaper environments, when the uncertainty estimates are accurate but the neural network output is inaccurate, our Bayesian approach searches the tree much more effectively. In addition, we investigate whether popular uncertainty estimation methods are accurate enough to yield significant gains in planning. Nir Greshler, David Ben-Eli, Carmel Rabinovitz, Gabi Guetta, Liran Gispan, Guy Zohar, Aviv Tamar |
ICML | 5 |