Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Ding

dblp:204/7509 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 40% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Vision and language · 15%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.512021
Attention over Learned Object Embeddings Enables Complex Visual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › deep video understanding › video reasoning
dynamic visual reasoning
0.512021
Attention over Learned Object Embeddings Enables Complex Visual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
object representation
0.512021
Attention over Learned Object Embeddings Enables Complex Visual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.512021
Attention over Learned Object Embeddings Enables Complex Visual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312017
Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functions · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › interpretable neural network
monotonic neural networks
0.312017
Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functions · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer architecture · 0.6attention · 0.6self-supervised dynamics learning · 0.5self-attention · 0.5object-centric representation · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.3monotonicity constraints · 0.3adam · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Know your audience: specializing grounded language models with listener subtraction
abstract
Effective communication requires adapting to the idiosyncrasies of each communicative context-such as the common ground shared with each partner.Humans demonstrate this ability to specialize to their audience in many contexts, such as the popular game Dixit.We take inspiration from Dixit to formulate a multiagent image reference game where a (trained) speaker model is rewarded for describing a target image such that one (pretrained) listener model can correctly identify it among distractors, but another listener cannot.To adapt, the speaker must exploit differences in the knowledge it shares with the different listeners.We show that finetuning an attention-based adapter between a CLIP vision encoder and a large language model in this contrastive, multi-agent setting gives rise to context-dependent natural language specialization from rewards only, without direct supervision.Through controlled experiments, we show that training a speaker with two listeners that perceive differently, using our method, allows the speaker to adapt to the idiosyncracies of the listeners.Furthermore, we show zero-shot transfer of the specialization to real-world data.Our experiments demonstrate a method for specializing grounded language models without direct supervision and highlight the interesting research challenges posed by complex multi-agent communication.
Aaditya K. Singh, David Ding, Andrew M. Saxe, Felix Hill, Andrew K. Lampinen
EACL2
2022 Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputs
Andrew Jaegle, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Carl Doersch, Catalin Ionescu, David Ding, Skanda Koppula, Daniel Zoran, Andrew Brock, Evan Shelhamer, Olivier J. Hénaff, Matt M. Botvinick, Andrew Zisserman, Oriol Vinyals, João Carreira 0001
ICLR6
2021 Attention over Learned Object Embeddings Enables Complex Visual Reasoning
abstract
Neural networks have achieved success in a wide array of perceptual tasks but often fail at tasks involving both perception and higher-level reasoning. On these more challenging tasks, bespoke approaches (such as modular symbolic components, independent dynamics models or semantic parsers) targeted towards that specific type of task have typically performed better. The downside to these targeted approaches, however, is that they can be more brittle than general-purpose neural networks, requiring significant modification or even redesign according to the particular task at hand. Here, we propose a more general neural-network-based approach to dynamic visual reasoning problems that obtains state-of-the-art performance on three different domains, in each case outperforming bespoke modular approaches tailored specifically to the task. Our method relies on learned object-centric representations, self-attention and self-supervised dynamics learning, and all three elements together are required for strong performance to emerge. The success of this combination suggests that there may be no need to trade off flexibility for performance on problems involving spatio-temporal or causal-style reasoning. With the right soft biases and learning objectives in a neural network we may be able to attain the best of both worlds.
David Ding, Felix Hill, Adam Santoro, Malcolm Reynolds, Matt M. Botvinick
NeurIPS1
2017 Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functions
abstract
We propose learning deep models that are monotonic with respect to a user-specified set of inputs by alternating layers of linear embeddings, ensembles of lattices, and calibrators (piecewise linear functions), with appropriate constraints for monotonicity, and jointly training the resulting network. We implement the layers and projections with new computational graph nodes in TensorFlow and use the Adam optimizer and batched stochastic gradients. Experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets show that six-layer monotonic deep lattice networks achieve state-of-the art performance for classification and regression with monotonicity guarantees.
Seungil You, David Ding, Kevin Robert Canini, Jan Pfeifer, Maya R. Gupta
NIPS2