Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fusheng Liu
dblp:204/8313
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-8371-9441ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 77% Mathematical optimization · 23% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Autocorrelation Matters: Understanding the Role of Initialization Schemes for State Space Models · ICLR 2025 From Generalization Analysis to Optimization Designs for State Space Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Diffusion Model as Pseudo-Anomalous Graph Generator for Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Diffusion Model as Pseudo-Anomalous Graph Generator for Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
graph-level anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Diffusion Model as Pseudo-Anomalous Graph Generator for Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
incentive mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Autocorrelation Matters: Understanding the Role of Initialization Schemes for State Space Models · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
contract theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cross-Domain Feature Augmentation for Domain Generalization · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cross-Domain Feature Augmentation for Domain Generalization · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › feature transformation
feature augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cross-Domain Feature Augmentation for Domain Generalization · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Generalization Analysis to Optimization Designs for State Space Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unraveling Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning via The Adaptation Learning Rate · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning › gradient-based meta-learning
model-agnostic meta-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unraveling Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning via The Adaptation Learning Rate · ICLR 2022 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Diffusion Model as Pseudo-Anomalous Graph Generator for Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convex optimization transformation · 1.7contract theory · 1.7classifier training · 1.7latent diffusion models · 0.9latent diffusion model · 0.9autocorrelation analysis · 0.9HiPPO framework · 0.9scaling rule · 0.8regularization · 0.8cross-domain feature augmentation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine LearningabstractCollaborative machine learning (CML) provides a promising paradigm for democratizing advanced technologies by enabling cost-sharing among participants. However, the potential for rent-seeking behaviors among parties can undermine such collaborations. Contract theory presents a viable solution by rewarding participants with models of varying accuracy based on their contributions. However, unlike monetary compensation, using models as rewards introduces unique challenges, particularly due to the stochastic nature of these rewards when contribution costs are privately held information. This paper formalizes the optimal contracting problem within CML and proposes a transformation that simplifies the non-convex optimization problem into one that can be solved through convex optimization algorithms. We conduct a detailed analysis of the properties that an optimal contract must satisfy when models serve as the rewards, and we explore the potential benefits and welfare implications of these contract-driven CML schemes through numerical experiments. Bingchen Wang, Zhaoxuan Wu, Fusheng Liu, Kian Hsiang Low |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Autocorrelation Matters: Understanding the Role of Initialization Schemes for State Space ModelsabstractCurrent methods for initializing state space model (SSM) parameters primarily rely on the HiPPO framework \citep{gu2023how}, which is based on online function approximation with the SSM kernel basis.
However, the HiPPO framework does not explicitly account for the effects of the temporal structures of input sequences on the optimization of SSMs.
In this paper, we take a further step to investigate the roles of SSM initialization schemes by considering the autocorrelation of input sequences.
Specifically, we: (1) rigorously characterize the dependency of the SSM timescale on sequence length based on sequence autocorrelation; (2) find that with a proper timescale, allowing a zero real part for the eigenvalues of the SSM state matrix mitigates the curse of memory while still maintaining stability at initialization; (3) show that the imaginary part of the eigenvalues of the SSM state matrix determines the conditioning of SSM optimization problems, and uncover an approximation-estimation tradeoff when training SSMs with a specific class of target functions. Fusheng Liu, Qianxiao Li |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Leveraging Diffusion Model as Pseudo-Anomalous Graph Generator for Graph-Level Anomaly DetectionabstractA fundamental challenge in graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) is the scarcity of anomalous graph data, as the training dataset typically contains only normal graphs or very few anomalies. This imbalance hinders the development of robust detection models. In this paper, we propose Anomalous Graph Diffusion (AGDiff), a framework that explores the potential of diffusion models in generating pseudo-anomalous graphs for GLAD. Unlike existing diffusion-based methods that focus on modeling data normality, AGDiff leverages the latent diffusion framework to incorporate subtle perturbations into graph representations, thereby generating pseudo-anomalous graphs that closely resemble normal ones. By jointly training a classifier to distinguish these generated graph anomalies from normal graphs, AGDiff learns more discriminative decision boundaries. The shift from solely modeling normality to explicitly generating and learning from pseudo graph anomalies enables AGDiff to effectively identify complex anomalous patterns that other approaches might overlook. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed AGDiff significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art GLAD baselines. Jinyu Cai, Yunhe Zhang 0001, Fusheng Liu, See-Kiong Ng |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | From Generalization Analysis to Optimization Designs for State Space ModelsabstractA State Space Model (SSM) is a foundation model in time series analysis, which has recently been shown as an alternative to transformers in sequence modeling. In this paper, we theoretically study the generalization of SSMs and propose improvements to training algorithms based on the generalization results. Specifically, we give a data-dependent generalization bound for SSMs, showing an interplay between the SSM parameters and the temporal dependencies of the training sequences. Leveraging the generalization bound, we (1) set up a scaling rule for model initialization based on the proposed generalization measure, which significantly improves the robustness of the output value scales on SSMs to different temporal patterns in the sequence data; (2) introduce a new regularization method for training SSMs to enhance the generalization performance. Numerical results are conducted to validate our results. Fusheng Liu, Qianxiao Li |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Cross-Domain Feature Augmentation for Domain Generalization
Yingnan Liu 0002, Yingtian Zou, Fusheng Liu, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2022 | Unraveling Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning via The Adaptation Learning Rate
Yingtian Zou, Fusheng Liu, Qianxiao Li |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Decision support analysis for risk identification and control of patients affected by COVID-19 based on Bayesian Networks
Jiang Shen, Fusheng Liu, Lipeng Fu, Zhenhe Dong, Jiachao Wu |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |