EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minyan Quan
dblp:205/0282
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 62% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 38% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
flash and SSD |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD
flash memory reliability |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
radiation-induced soft errors |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD
SSD reliability |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory · Proc. IEEE 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design validation · 0.3JEDEC JESD218 qualification · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash MemoryabstractThis paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data. Neal R. Mielke, Robert E. Frickey, Ivan Kalastirsky, Minyan Quan, Dmitry Ustinov, Venkatesh J. Vasudevan |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |