Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Madhumita Bharde

dblp:205/2215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 65% Storage systems · 22% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
anomaly detection
0.312018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › proactive fault tolerance
failure prediction
0.312018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018
Distributed systems › anomaly detection
log-based anomaly detection
0.312018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.312018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
system logs
0.112018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.112018
ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism · INFOCOM 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.3feature selection · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 FLEET: Fluid Layout of End to End Topology
abstract
Clustering, virtualization and multi-tenancy are so ubiquitous across all layers of enterprise software deployments, that the overall topology of these stacks has reached unprecedented levels of complexity. A lot of stress is given on independently monitoring all layers of the stack. Almost all SaaS, IaaS and PaaS vendors along with traditional compute and storage vendors provide descriptive, prescriptive and predictive analytics for individual layers of software and hardware. However, with complex layouts and schemes possible for differently juxtaposed parts, often coming from multiple vendors, it is almost impossible to sift through the barrage of dashboards, events, alerts and recommendations. The fundamental problem in deriving holistic insights lies in the fact that these layers are opaque to each other, or at least they have been treated as such for the most part. With Fluid Layout of End to End Topology (FLEET), we establish that adjacent layers of the stack have clues about each other which can be used to ‘‘stitch’’ them together and infer the exact footprint of entities across layers. We standardize a mechanism to collect dynamic configuration information across the stack, process it and store the woven topology at scale.
Madhumita Bharde, Karuna Nayak
ICPADS1
2020 Multi-criteria online frame-subset selection for autonomous vehicle videos
Soumi Das, Sayan Mandal, Ashwin Bhoyar, Madhumita Bharde, Niloy Ganguly, Suparna Bhattacharya, Sourangshu Bhattacharya
Pattern Recognit. Lett.4
2018 ADELE: Anomaly Detection from Event Log Empiricism
abstract
A large population of users gets affected by sudden slowdown or shutdown of an enterprise application. System administrators and analysts spend considerable amount of time dealing with functional and performance bugs. These problems are particularly hard to detect and diagnose in most computer systems, since there is a huge amount of system generated supportability data (counters, logs etc.) that need to be analyzed. Most often, there isn't a very clear or obvious root cause. Timely identification of significant change in application behavior is very important to prevent negative impact on the service. In this paper, we present ADELE, an empirical, data-driven methodology for early detection of anomalies in data storage systems. The key feature of our solution is diligent selection of features from system logs and development of effective machine learning techniques for anomaly prediction. ADELE learns from system's own history to establish the baseline of normal behavior and gives accurate indications of the time period when something is amiss for a system. Validation on more than 4800 actual support cases shows~83% true positive rate and~12% false positive rate in identifying periods when the machine is not performing normally. We also establish the existence of problem “signatures” which help map customer problems to already seen issues in the field. ADELE's capability to predict early paves way for online failure prediction for customer systems.
Subhendu Khatuya, Niloy Ganguly, Jayanta Basak, Madhumita Bharde, Bivas Mitra
INFOCOM4
2015 Dynamic Provisioning of Storage Workloads
Jayanta Basak, Madhumita Bharde
LISA2